0000000000077544

AUTHOR

Nicolas Benguigui

showing 2 related works from this author

Intercepting real and simulated falling objects: what is the difference?

2009

International audience; The use of virtual reality is nowadays common in many studies in the field of human perception and movement control, particularly in interceptive actions. However, the ecological validity of the simulation is often taken for granted without having been formally established. If participants were to perceive the real situation and its virtual equivalent in a different fashion, the generalization of the results obtained in virtual reality to real life would be highly questionable. We tested the ecological validity of virtual reality in this context by comparing the timing of interceptive actions based upon actually falling objects and their simulated counterparts. The r…

MaleTime Factorsmedia_common.quotation_subjectMotion PerceptionVirtual realityMotor Activity050105 experimental psychology03 medical and health sciencesUser-Computer InterfaceYoung Adult0302 clinical medicineHuman–computer interactionPerceptionPsychophysicsHumans0501 psychology and cognitive sciencesComputer SimulationSimulationMovement controlmedia_commonAnalysis of Variance[SCCO.NEUR]Cognitive science/NeuroscienceGeneral Neuroscience05 social sciencesFalling ObjectsBiomechanical PhenomenaFemalePsychology030217 neurology & neurosurgeryPsychomotor PerformanceJournal of neuroscience methods
researchProduct

Age-Correlated Incremental Consideration of Velocity Information in Relative Time-to-Arrival Judgments

2010

International audience; One hundred fifty-one children and 43 adults judged which of 2 cartoon birds would be the first to arrive at a common finish line. Objects moved unidirectionally along parallel trajectories, either at the same or different speeds, and disappeared at different distances from the goal. Overall, 9-10-year-old children performed as well as adults, but 4-5- and 6-8-year-olds erred significantly more often. On trials for which distance to goal at disappearance was a valid cue, 4-5-year-olds scored 80% correct, and no differences were seen between 6-10-year-olds and adults. On the opposite type of trials, where the trailing bird would win the race, only adults retained thei…

General Computer ScienceSocial PsychologyTransition (fiction)05 social sciencesExperimental and Cognitive PsychologyFinish line050105 experimental psychologyTask (project management)Developmental psychology03 medical and health sciencesRace (biology)0302 clinical medicinevelocity informationAge groupschildren[SCCO.PSYC]Cognitive science/Psychology0501 psychology and cognitive sciencesPsychologyjudgment030217 neurology & neurosurgeryEcology Evolution Behavior and Systematics
researchProduct