A phase IB, multicenter, open-label study to assess the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of the pleiotropic pathway modifier CC122 administered orally to patients with advanced HCC.

379 Background: CC122 is a novel cereblon-modulating agent with multiple biologic activities including potent immunomodulatory and antiangiogenic effects. CC-122 binding to cereblon promotes ubiquitination and subsequent degradation of lymphoid transcription factors Ikaros and Aiolos resulting in activation of T cells. Methods: Following establishment of oral CC122 3 mg daily (QD) as the MTD in phase 1a (Blood 122:2905 2013), an expansion cohort of advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC) subjects was enrolled. All subjects had progressed on or were intolerant to sorafenib. Efficacy was assessed per RECIST 1.1 criteria. Results: As of Jan. 13, 2016, 25 advanced HCC subjects were enrolled. T…

A French prospective pilot study for identifying dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) deficiency in breast cancer patients (pts) receiving capecitabine (cap)

e13519 Background: For fluoropyrimidines, and especially cap, Health Authorities point out that DPD deficiency confers a significant risk of major toxicity (tox). Identification of at-risk pts is thus relevant. This multicentric prospective study of the French GPCO group (Groupe de Pharmacologie Clinique Oncologique, Unicancer) evaluated the sensitivity, specificity and predictive values of DPD phenotyping and genotyping for predicting severe cap-related tox in metastatic breast cancer pts. Methods: 303 pts were included (15 institutions), 88% received cap as monotherapy, 28% were treated as first line (mean dose at 1st cycle 1957 mg/m2/d). Pre-treatment dihydrouracil (UH2) and uracil (U) …

Erratum à l’article : « Dépistage du cancer du sein : en route vers le futur » [Bull. Cancer 103 (2016) 753–763]

Dépistage du cancer du sein : en route vers le futur

Breast cancer remains a potentially lethal disease, which requires aggressive treatments and is associated with long-term consequences. Its prognosis is linked to both tumor biology and burden at diagnosis. Although treatments have allowed important improvements in prognosis over the past 20 years, breast cancer screening remains necessary. Mammographic screening allows earlier stage diagnoses and a decrease of breast cancer specific mortality. However, breast cancer screening modalities should be revised with the objective to address demonstrated limitations of mammographic screening (limited benefit, imperfect sensitivity and specificity, overdiagnoses, radiation-induced morbidity). Furth…