0000000000173722

AUTHOR

Katri Laimi

showing 3 related works from this author

Psychometric properties of 12-item self-administered World Health Organization disability assessment schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0) among general populati…

2019

WHODAS 2.0 is a unified scale to measuring disability across diseases, countries, and cultures. The objective was to explore the available evidence on the psychometric properties of 12-item self-administered WHODAS 2.0 among a general population and people with non-acute physical causes of disability.Five databases Medline, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus, and PsycINFO were searched for papers related to the validity, reliability, responsiveness, minimal clinically important difference or minimal detectable change of 12-item self-administered WHODAS 2.0. In order to avoid missing any potentially relevant studies, the search clauses were left as generic as possible and the refining search was…

Adultpsychometrics030506 rehabilitationPsychometricsPsychometricsdisability evaluationPopulationWHODASWorld Health OrganizationfunctioningDisability EvaluationYoung Adult03 medical and health sciences0302 clinical medicinevammaisuusInternational Classification of Functioning Disability and HealthFloor effectHumansDisabled Personstoimintarajoitteeteducationfloor effecteducation.field_of_studyconsistencyRehabilitationReproducibility of Resultsinternational classification of functioningpsykometriikkaSchedule (workplace)ceiling effectdisability and healthScale (social sciences)Self-AdministeredCeiling effectFemalereproducibility of results0305 other medical sciencePsychologyterveysarviointi030217 neurology & neurosurgeryClinical psychology
researchProduct

Gender-related differences in psychometric properties of WHO Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0

2019

Objective of this study was to investigate the gender-related differential item function of 12-item WHODAS 2.0 amongst patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain. This was a cross-sectional survey study among 1,988 patients at a university Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine outpatient clinic. To assess DIF, WHODAS 2.0 items were dichotomized as `none’ rated by respondents as `0’ versus `any limitation’ rated as `1,2,3 or 4’. The item response theory analysis was used to define discrimination and difficulty parameters of a questionnaire. The probit logistic regression was used to test uniformity of DIF between gender groups. The results of DIF analysis were presented and evaluated graphica…

AdultMalevalidity030506 rehabilitationPsychometricsCross-sectional studysukupuolierotPhysical Therapy Sports Therapy and RehabilitationPhysical examinationProbitLogistic regressiontuki- ja liikuntaelimetRehabilitation Centersbehavioral disciplines and activitiesDisability Evaluation03 medical and health sciencesSex Factors0302 clinical medicinetoimintakykyMusculoskeletal PainSurveys and QuestionnairesItem response theorymedicinedifferential item functioningHumansOutpatient clinicDisabled Personsmusculoskeletal painPhysical ExaminationAgedmedicine.diagnostic_testRehabilitationkipuMiddle AgedTest (assessment)WHO Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0psykometriikkaSchedule (workplace)Cross-Sectional StudiesLogistic Modelskrooninen kipuFemale0305 other medical sciencePsychology030217 neurology & neurosurgeryClinical psychologyInternational Journal of Rehabilitation Research
researchProduct

Floor and ceiling effects of the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 among patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain

2019

The aim of this study was to investigate the floor and ceiling effects of 12-item World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS). This was a cross-sectional survey study at a university’s physical and rehabilitation medicine outpatient clinic of 1988 patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain. Floor and ceiling effects were calculated as relative frequencies of the lowest or the highest possible scores for each item. The probit plotting method was used to detect the non-normality of distribution of the total score graphically. A significant floor effect of 15–79% was observed in all 12 WHODAS 2.0 items. A substantial floor effect for total score was also detected grap…

MaleMusculoskeletal painSchedulemedicine.medical_specialtyPsychometricsarviointimenetelmätStatistics as TopicPhysical Therapy Sports Therapy and RehabilitationCeiling (cloud)World Health OrganizationWorld healthDisability assessmentDisability EvaluationMusculoskeletal PainSurveys and QuestionnairesHumansMedicineOutpatient clinictoimintarajoitteetmusculoskeletal painWorld Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0business.industryRehabilitationReproducibility of Resultsta3141Survey researchMiddle AgedCross-Sectional StudiesPhysical therapykrooninen kipuFemaleChronic PainbusinessInternational Journal of Rehabilitation Research
researchProduct