0000000000174604

AUTHOR

G. Bertolone

showing 2 related works from this author

Incidental findings in a series of 2500 gene panel tests for a genetic predisposition to cancer: Results and impact on patients.

2020

Abstract With next generation sequencing, physicians are faced with more complex and uncertain data, particularly incidental findings (IF). Guidelines for the return of IF have been published by learned societies. However, little is known about how patients are affected by these results in a context of oncogenetic testing. Over 4 years, 2500 patients with an indication for genetic testing underwent a gene cancer panel. If an IF was detected, patients were contacted by a physician/genetic counsellor and invited to take part in a semi-structured interview to assess their understanding of the result, the change in medical care, the psychological impact, and the transmission of results to the f…

0301 basic medicineAdultMalemedicine.medical_specialtyPatientsContext (language use)030105 genetics & heredity03 medical and health sciencesNeoplasmsGeneticsmedicineGenetic predispositionHumansGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseGenetic TestingCHEK2Genetics (clinical)Genetic testingAgedIncidental Findingsmedicine.diagnostic_testbusiness.industryCancerRegretGeneral MedicineMiddle Agedmedicine.disease030104 developmental biologyAttitudeFamily medicineAnxietyFemalemedicine.symptomReturn of resultsbusinessEuropean journal of medical genetics
researchProduct

Secondary findings from whole-exome/genome sequencing evaluating stakeholder perspectives. A review of the literature

2019

IF 2.004 (2017); International audience; With the development of next generation sequencing, beyond identifying the cause of manifestations that justified prescription of the test, other information with potential interest for patients and their families, defined as secondary findings (SF), can be provided once patients have given informed consent, in particular when therapeutic and preventive options are available. The disclosure of such findings has caused much debate. The aim of this work was to summarize all opinion-based studies focusing on SF, so as to shed light on the concerns that this question generate. A review of the literature was performed, focusing on all PubMed articles repo…

0301 basic medicinemedicine.medical_specialtyPatientsGenetic CounselingDisclosure[SDV.GEN.GH] Life Sciences [q-bio]/Genetics/Human genetics030105 genetics & heredityChoice Behavior03 medical and health sciencesSecondary findingsStakeholder ParticipationInformed consentMultidisciplinary approachExome SequencingGeneticsmedicineHumansGenetic TestingMedical prescriptionExomeGenetics (clinical)Literature reviewIncidental FindingsOpinion based studiesModalitiesStakeholderSubject (documents)General Medicine3. Good healthTest (assessment)030104 developmental biologyAttitude[SDV.GEN.GH]Life Sciences [q-bio]/Genetics/Human geneticsFamily medicinePsychologyActionabilityEuropean Journal of Medical Genetics
researchProduct