0000000000248994

AUTHOR

D. Lacombe

showing 1 related works from this author

Rare Cancers Europe (RCE) methodological recommendations for clinical studies in rare cancers: A European consensus position paper

2015

While they account for one-fifth of new cancer cases, rare cancers are difficult to study. A higher than average degree of uncertainty should be accommodated for clinical as well as for population-based decision making. Rules of rational decision making in conditions of uncertainty should be rigorously followed and would need widely informative clinical trials. In principle, any piece of new evidence would need to be exploited in rare cancers. Methodologies to explicitly weigh and combine all the available evidence should be refined, and the Bayesian logic can be instrumental to this end. Likewise, Bayesian-design trials may help optimize the low number of patients liable to be enrolled in …

Research designPathologyData baseResearch methodologyElectronic medical recordDiseaseReviewProceduresTreatment responseClinical trials; Rare cancers; Research methodology; Clinical Studies as Topic; Humans; Neoplasms; Rare Diseases; Research Design; Hematology; OncologyClinical trialsNeoplasmsReimbursementPriority journaleducation.field_of_studyClinical Studies as TopicClinical studies as topicHematologyRare diseasesEuropeOncologyResearch designResearch DesignClinical decision makingHumanmedicine.medical_specialtyPractice guidelineCase findingPopulationHealth care qualityReviewsCancer researchClinical studyRare DiseasesSDG 3 - Good Health and Well-beingConceptual frameworkmedicineHumansRare cancersTumor markerIntensive care medicineeducationAntineoplastic activityFlexibility (engineering)Surrogate endpointbusiness.industryMethodologyRare cancerStudy designCancer survivalReimbursementClinical trialClinical trials; Rare cancers; Research methodology; Hematology; OncologyPatient informationClinical effectivenessPosition paperNeoplasmbusinessRare disease
researchProduct