0000000000280657
AUTHOR
Eira Ihalainen
showing 8 related works from this author
Investigating Müllerian mimicry: predator learning and variation in prey defences
2006
Inexperienced predators are assumed to select for similarity of warning signals in aposematic species (Mullerian mimicry) when learning to avoid them. Recent theoretical work predicts that if co-mimic species have unequal defences, predators attack them according to their average unpalatability and mimicry may not be beneficial for the better defended co-mimic. In this study, we tested in a laboratory environment whether a uniform warning signal is superior to a variable one in promoting predator learning, and simultaneously whether co-mimics are preyed upon according to their average unpalatability. There was an interaction of signal variation and unpalatability but inexperienced birds did…
Do avian predators select for seasonal polyphenism in the European map butterfly Araschnia levana (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae)?
2012
Seasonal polyphenism in animal colour patterns indicates that temporal variation in selection pressures maintains phenotypic plasticity. Spring generation of the polyphenic European map butterfly Araschnia levana has an orange–black fritillary-like pattern whilst individuals of the summer generation are black with white bands across the wings. What selects for the colour difference is unknown. Because predation is a major selection pressure for insect coloration, we first tested whether map butterfly coloration could have a warning function (i.e. whether the butterflies are unpalatable to birds). In a following field experiment with butterfly dummies we tested whether the spring form is bet…
Can experienced birds select for Müllerian mimicry?
2008
Field experiments have shown that avian predators in the wild can select for similarity of warning signals in aposematic prey (Müllerian mimicry) because a common signal is better protected than a signal that is novel and rare. The original theory of Müllerian mimicry assumes that the mechanism promoting mimicry is predator learning; by sharing a signal, the comimic species share the mortality that is due to sampling by inexperienced predators. Predation events have not been observed in the wild, and learning experiments with naive bird predators in a laboratory have not unambiguously shown a benefit of a uniform signal compared with different signals. As predators in the field experiments …
Co-mimics have a mutualistic relationship despite unequal defences
2007
Defensive mimicry, where species have evolved to resemble others in order to evade predators, is quite common in the animal kingdom. The two extremes of the mimicry spectrum are known as 'batesian' and 'mullerian'. Batesian mimics develop signals — visual cues for instance — that are similar to those of species being mimicked, but stop short of adopting the attribute that makes it unprofitable prey to predators. Mullerian mimics both resemble the model species and share the anti-predation attribute — by being dangerous or unpalatable. These different types of mimic were identified a century ago, but the dynamics of mimicry between unequally defended prey remain unresolved. In an experiment …
Direction and strength of selection by predators for the color of the aposematic wood tiger moth
2011
Conventionally, predation is assumed to select for conspicuousness and uniformity of warning signals in aposematic (i.e., chemically defended and warning signaling) prey because this enhances predators' initial and learned avoidance. On the other hand, it has been suggested that both variation in the background where the signal is displayed as well as variation in predators' probability to attack defended prey may favor intermediate signals or relax selection for signal monomorphism. We studied the direction and strength of selection for the hind wing color (orange vs. red) of female Parasemia plantaginis moths. Birds found the moths aversive and avoided them by sight both in laboratory and…
DIET QUALITY AFFECTS WARNING COLORATION INDIRECTLY: EXCRETION COSTS IN A GENERALIST HERBIVORE
2009
Aposematic herbivores are under selection pressure from their host plants and predators. Although many aposematic herbivores exploit plant toxins in their own secondary defense, dealing with these harmful compounds might underlay costs. We studied whether the allocation of energy to detoxification and/or sequestration of host plant defense chemicals trades off with warning signal expression. We used a generalist aposematic herbivore Parasemia plantaginis (Arctiidae), whose adults and larvae show extensive phenotypic and genetic variation in coloration. We reared larvae from selection lines for small and large larval warning signals on Plantago lanceolata with either low or high concentratio…
Experiments on defensive mimicry : linkages between predator behaviour and qualities of the prey
2006
Myrkylliset tai pahanmakuiset lajit voivat puolustautua saalistajia vastaan mainostamalla syömäkelvottomuuttaan näkyvin varoitussignaalein kuten värein. Saalistajien on tavallisesti opittava kokeilemalla välttämään pahoja ja signaloivia eli aposemaattisia lajeja. Varoitussignaaleja myös jäljitellään luonnossa. Batesin mimikria on ilmiö, jossa syömäkelpoinen matkijalaji suojautuu saalistajilta jäljittelemällä aposemaattisen mallilajin signaalia. Müllerin mimikriassa taas aposemaattiset ja ”näköislajit” käyttävät keskenään samanlaisia signaaleja.Loisteliaimmat esimerkit mimikriasta ovat trooppisia perhosia. Väitöskirjassaan Ihalainen tutki, miten samanlainen signalointi ja maku vaikuttavat sa…
Prey community structure affects how predators select for Müllerian mimicry
2012
Müllerian mimicry describes the close resemblance between aposematic prey species; it is thought to be beneficial because sharing a warning signal decreases the mortality caused by sampling by inexperienced predators learning to avoid the signal. It has been hypothesized that selection for mimicry is strongest in multi-species prey communities where predators are more prone to misidentify the prey than in simple communities. In this study, wild great tits ( Parus major ) foraged from either simple (few prey appearances) or complex (several prey appearances) artificial prey communities where a specific model prey was always present. Owing to slower learning, the model did suffer higher mort…