0000000000282498

AUTHOR

Xiaoming Jiang

showing 2 related works from this author

The Psychological Science Accelerator’s COVID-19 rapid-response dataset

2023

Funder: Amazon Web Services (AWS) Imagine Grant

Statistics and Probability223 participants with varying completion rates. Participants completed the survey from 111 geopolitical regions in 44 unique languages/dialects. The anonymized dataset described here is provided in both raw and processed formats to facilitate re-use and further analyses. The dataset offers secondary analytic opportunities to explore copingBF Psychology230 Affective NeuroscienceHealth Behaviorand demographic information for each participant. Each participant started the study with the same general questions and then was randomized to complete either one longer experiment or two shorter experiments. Data were provided by 73Message framingDiseasesLibrary and Information Sciences:Ciências Sociais::Psicologia [Domínio/Área Científica]geographical and cultural context characterizationHV Social pathology. Social and public welfare. CriminologypandemiatEducationa general questionnaire examining health prevention behaviors and COVID-19 experienceddc:150SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-beingRA0421 Public health. Hygiene. Preventive MedicineSurveys and QuestionnairesAdaptation PsychologicalyleiskartoituksetHumansPendienteHealth behaviorsPandemicsframingBehaviour Change and Well-beingEmotion regulationSelf-determination messagingand self-determination across a diverseCOVID-19kansainvälinen vertailuResearch dataComputer Science Applicationswhich can be merged with other time-sampled or geographic data.cognitive reappraisalsglobal sample obtained at the onset of the COVID-19 pandemicterveyskäyttäytyminenIn response to the COVID-19 pandemic/dk/atira/pure/sustainabledevelopmentgoals/good_health_and_well_beingand autonomy framing manipulations on behavioral intentions and affective measures. The data collected (April to October 2020) included specific measures for each experimental studyStatistics Probability and UncertaintyPeople’s healthtutkimusaineistosurvey-tutkimusDatasetInformation Systemsthe Psychological Science Accelerator coordinated three large-scale psychological studies to examine the effects of loss-gain framing
researchProduct

Open science as a better gatekeeper for science and society: a perspective from neurolaw

2018

Results from cognitive neuroscience have been cited as evidence in courtrooms around the world, and their admissibility has been a challenge for the legal system. Unfortunately, the recent reproducibility crisis in cognitive neuroscience, showing that the published studies in cognitive neuroscience may not be as trustworthy as expected, has made the situation worse. Here we analysed how the irreproducible results in cognitive neuroscience literature could compromise the standards for admissibility of scientific evidence, and pointed out how the open science movement may help to alleviate these problems. We conclude that open science not only benefits the scientific community but also the le…

bepress|Life Sciences|Research Methods in Life SciencesOpen sciencePsyArXiv|Social and Behavioral Sciences|Forensic and Legal PsychologyMultidisciplinarybepress|Law|Law and Psychology05 social sciencesPerspective (graphical)NeurolawPsyArXiv|Meta-science050105 experimental psychologyScientific evidencebepress|Life Sciences|Neuroscience and NeurobiologyPsyArXiv|Neuroscience|Cognitive NeurosciencePsyArXiv|Social and Behavioral Sciences03 medical and health sciences0302 clinical medicinePsyArXiv|Neurosciencebepress|Social and Behavioral Sciences0501 psychology and cognitive sciencesEngineering ethicsSociologybepress|Life Sciences|Neuroscience and Neurobiology|Cognitive Neuroscience030217 neurology & neurosurgeryScience Bulletin
researchProduct