0000000000335669
AUTHOR
Paul-egbert Reimitz
showing 3 related works from this author
Meta-analysis of blood pressure (BP) reductions with olmesartan medoxomil (OM) compared with active control (AC) in patients (pts) with hypertension …
2015
Meta-analysis of blood pressure (BP) reductions with olmesartan medoxomil (OM) compared with active control (AC) in patients (pts) with hypertension (HTN) Josep Redon,y, 6 Prakash Deedwania, Kazuomi Kario, Jiguang Wang, Joris Versteden, Paul-Egbert Reimitz. Daiichi Sankyo Europe GmbH, Munich, Germany; Daiichi Sankyo Europe GmbH, Munich, Germany; Jichi University School of Medicine, Japan; Shanghai Institute of Hypertension, Shanghai, China; University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States; University of Valencia, Madrid, Spain
Meta-analysis of olmesartan medoxomil (OM) monotherapy in reducing blood pressure (BP) in elderly patients with hypertension (HTN)
2015
Meta-analysis of blood pressure (BP) reductions with olmesartan medoxomil (OM) compared with active control (AC) in patients (pts) with hypertension (HTN) Josep Redon,y, 6 Prakash Deedwania, Kazuomi Kario, Jiguang Wang, Joris Versteden, Paul-Egbert Reimitz. Daiichi Sankyo Europe GmbH, Munich, Germany; Daiichi Sankyo Europe GmbH, Munich, Germany; Jichi University School of Medicine, Japan; Shanghai Institute of Hypertension, Shanghai, China; University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States; University of Valencia, Madrid, Spain
Comparative effectiveness of an angiotensin receptor blocker, olmesartan medoxomil, in older hypertensive patients
2018
The efficacy and safety of olmesartan medoxomil (OM) vs active control (AC) monotherapy among elderly patients aged 60‐79 years (N = 4487) was evaluated by meta‐analysis (25 studies). In all patients, change from baseline to end point in blood pressure (BP) was significantly greater with OM vs AC (−19.5/−11.9 vs −16.8/−10.7 mm Hg). Greater proportions of OM‐ vs AC‐treated patients achieved BP goals. In patients with impaired renal function (estimated glomerular filtration rate <60 mL/min/1.73 m(2)), OM treatment resulted in a greater mean change from baseline in systolic BP vs AC (−21.2 vs −18.7 mm Hg, respectively) and a greater proportion of patients achieving BP goals. These parameters w…