0000000000418882

AUTHOR

Andrea C. Tricco

showing 2 related works from this author

Assessing the format and content of journal published and non-journal published rapid review reports: A comparative study

2020

Background As production of rapid reviews (RRs) increases in healthcare, knowing how to efficiently convey RR evidence to various end-users is important given they are often intended to directly inform decision-making. Little is known about how often RRs are produced in the published or unpublished domains, and what and how information is structured. Objectives To compare and contrast report format and content features of journal-published (JP) and non-journal published (NJP) RRs. Methods JP RRs were identified from key databases, and NJP RRs were identified from a grey literature search of 148 RR producing organizations and were sampled proportionate to cluster size by organization and pro…

Databases Factual ; Peer Review Research ; PublishingMedical JournalsStructural EngineeringDatabases FactualSciencePeer ReviewDecision MakingMEDLINESocial SciencesResearch and Analysis Methods03 medical and health sciencesDatabase and Informatics Methods0302 clinical medicineCognitionMedicine and Health SciencesPsychology030212 general & internal medicineDatabase SearchingScientific PublishingLanguagePeer Review ResearchPublishingMultidisciplinaryInformation retrievalExecutive summaryHealth Care Policy030503 health policy & servicesQRCognitive PsychologyBiology and Life SciencesGrey literatureResearch AssessmentBuilt StructuresFull ProtocolHealth CareCluster sizeMedicineCognitive ScienceEngineering and Technology0305 other medical sciencePsychologyMedical HumanitiesResearch ArticleNeurosciencePLoS ONE
researchProduct

Epidemiology and Reporting Characteristics of Systematic Reviews of Biomedical Research: A Cross-Sectional Study.

2016

Background Systematic reviews (SRs) can help decision makers interpret the deluge of published biomedical literature. However, a SR may be of limited use if the methods used to conduct the SR are flawed, and reporting of the SR is incomplete. To our knowledge, since 2004 there has been no cross-sectional study of the prevalence, focus, and completeness of reporting of SRs across different specialties. Therefore, the aim of our study was to investigate the epidemiological and reporting characteristics of a more recent cross-section of SRs. Methods and Findings We searched MEDLINE to identify potentially eligible SRs indexed during the month of February 2014. Citations were screened using pre…

Research designmedicine.medical_specialtyBiomedical ResearchSystematic ReviewsCross-sectional studyMEDLINEResearch and Analysis Methods03 medical and health sciencesDatabase and Informatics Methods0302 clinical medicineMathematical and Statistical TechniquesConDuCT-IIEpidemiologyparasitic diseasesmedicineMedicine and Health SciencesHumansMedical physics030212 general & internal medicineDatabase SearchingStatistical Methods/dk/atira/pure/core/keywords/conduct_iiStatistical DataHealth Care Policybusiness.industryRGeneral MedicinePublication biasResearch Assessment3. Good healthHealth CareReview Literature as TopicSystematic reviewCross-Sectional StudiesData extractionResearch DesignMeta-analysisPhysical SciencesResearch Reporting GuidelinesMedicinebusinessEpidemiologic Methods030217 neurology & neurosurgeryMathematicsStatistics (Mathematics)Screening GuidelinesResearch ArticleMeta-AnalysisPLoS medicine
researchProduct