0000000000458131
AUTHOR
Smorto
showing 7 related works from this author
プラットフォーム・エコノミーにおける 弱者保護
2020
はじめに 一 プラットフォーム・エコノミーにおけるバーゲニングパワー (1) 能力向上プロセスの評価:インターネットの台頭から P2P 取引へ (2) プラットフォーム・エコノミーにおいて弱者は存在するか? 二 ピア・ツー・ピア・エコノミーのための法的枠組 (1) 標準約款契約についての調査 (2) プラットフォームとその利用者 (3) ピア・ツー・ピア取引 結語-プラットフォーム・エコノミーの弱者を如何に保護するか (Japanese) Known by many names – platform, sharing, peer-to-peer (p2p), collaborative economy, and so on - entirely new business models have emerged in recent years, whereby online platforms use digital technologies to connect distinct groups of users in order to facilitate transactions for the exchange of assets and services. This dramatic shift in business organisation and market structure has opened an intense debate on the persisting need for those regulatory measures that typica…
Il ruolo della comparazione giuridica nella contesa per la sovranità digitale
2023
The article scrutinises the main narratives adopted by the E.U., the U.S. and China in the fight for digital sovereignty. It analyses the ongoing dialogue between legal systems that is taking place in the digital sphere to ponder on the role of comparative law in this dialogue. With legal systems called to apply a territorial law to a global phenomenon, comparative law proves to be a fundamental tool in the dispute for digital sovereignty, widely employed across legal formants, with a critical role in creating a distinctive identity for the legal systems.
Verso una disciplina giuridica della sharing mobility nell’Unione europea
2020
L’articolo propone un’analisi delle principali questioni relative alla regolamentazione dei servizi di sharing (o shared) mobility. Attraverso una disamina dei tratti peculiari dei diversi modelli di organizzazione economica per l’offerta di servizi di mobilità condivisa, si ricostruiscono i principali nodi problematici connessi tanto alla definizione di regole di governo del mercato dei nuovi servizi di mobilità, quanto all’esigenza di garantire una mobilità che sia anche veicolo di inclusione sociale e di sostenibilità ambientale. Nel farlo, l’articolo offre una riflessione critica sulle opposte polarità che caratterizzano il dibattito corrente in tema di sharing mobility: per un verso, l…
Soluzioni tecnologiche e lotta al Covid-19: una riflessione critica
2023
Technological solutions and the fight against Covid-19. A critical reflection – Digital technologies have played a decisive role in the definition and implementation of measures to combat the Covid-19 pandemic, from the dissemination of information to the monitoring of behavior. Yet their use has not always achieved the desired effects. By reviewing the case of tracking apps, this contribution aims to take stock of the role of technologies and the private sector during the pandemic emergency and to reason about the causes of their failure.
La tutela del contraente debole nella platform economy dopo il Regolamento UE 2019/1150 e la Direttiva UE 2019/2161 (c.d. Omnibus)
2020
The article summarise the main legal issue related to the protection of users of online service providers in the light of Reg. EU 2019/1150 and Dir. EU 2019/2161
Quali regole per la sharing mobility in Europa. Un’introduzione
2020
All over Europe urban mobility services are subject to specialized regulatory regimes. In the last decade, new technologies have upended the sector, making possible new ways of organizing the industry. Platforms like Uber and Lyft have been among the first to seize these possibilities. However, they have often done so without regard for national and local laws. In response to these changes many EU jurisdictions have amended their sectoral regulations, revisiting issues such as licensing, background checks and insurance. The result has been a vast landscape of legal, commercial, and political conflict where local administrators, private operators and citizens are obliged to act within a norm…
平台经济中的弱势群体保护
2018
内容提要:近年来，以平台经济、分享经济、P2P、协作经济等多种名称闻名的全新商 业模式应运而生，其利用数字技术通过网络平台连接不同用户群体，助推资产与服务交易 便捷化。这一商业形态和市场结构的剧变引发了一场激烈的讨论，即在双边 B2C交易模 式中采取的用来保护弱势群体的管制措施是否应当继续维持。人们普遍呼吁建立一个更 为“平等的竞争环境”，这为重新考量监管范围及将监管责任下放给平台提供了有力的支 持。本文对此提出质疑。平台经常利用标准化文本、体系结构和算法对包括需求方、供给 方在内的用户施加影响，而市场机制多大程度上能自发地形成针对这一问题的解决办法 尚未可知。本文第一部分旨在阐述平台缩小不平等性的原因，并解释为何这一结论未能 充分考虑到许多相反的因素。第二部分则对网络平台所采用的条款进行检视，以此评估 其是否映射出各方权利义务的不对等。本文认为在新兴交易市场中保护弱势群体利益至 关重要，并提出些许建议。