0000000000465050

AUTHOR

David Moher

Citations and metrics of journals discontinued from Scopus for publication concerns: the GhoS(t)copus Project

Background: Scopus is a leading bibliometric database. It contains a large part of the articles cited in peer-reviewed publications. The journals included in Scopus are periodically re-evaluated to ensure they meet indexing criteria and some journals might be discontinued for 'publication concerns'. Previously published articles may remain indexed and can be cited. Their metrics have yet to be studied. This study aimed to evaluate the main features and metrics of journals discontinued from Scopus for publication concerns, before and after their discontinuation, and to determine the extent of predatory journals among the discontinued journals. Methods: We surveyed the list of discontinued jo…

research product

Predatory journals enter biomedical databases through public funding

Predatory publishing is an international, cross disciplinary threat to the integrity of the scientific system • A worrying number of articles published in predatory journals are indexed in biomedical databases such as PubMed, the free access biomedical database maintained by the National Library of Medicine • Public funding, under open access policies, seems to be the mechanism by which articles are displayed in PubMed. • Providing guidance to publicly funded authors on how to publish their work in legitimate open-access venues will likely stop the wasteful use of public money to cover the fees of predatory journals.

research product

Inflated citations and metrics of journals discontinued from Scopus for publication concerns: the GhoS(t)copus Project

AbstractBackgroundScopus is a leading bibliometric database. It contains the largest number of articles cited in peer-reviewed publications. The journals included in Scopus are periodically re-evaluated to ensure they meet indexing criteria and some journals might be discontinued for publication concerns. These journals remain indexed and can be cited. Their metrics have yet to be studied. This study aimed to evaluate the main features and metrics of journals discontinued from Scopus for publication concerns, before and after their discontinuation, and to determine the extent of predatory journals among the discontinued journals.MethodsWe surveyed the list of discontinued journals from Scop…

research product

Assessing the format and content of journal published and non-journal published rapid review reports: A comparative study

Background As production of rapid reviews (RRs) increases in healthcare, knowing how to efficiently convey RR evidence to various end-users is important given they are often intended to directly inform decision-making. Little is known about how often RRs are produced in the published or unpublished domains, and what and how information is structured. Objectives To compare and contrast report format and content features of journal-published (JP) and non-journal published (NJP) RRs. Methods JP RRs were identified from key databases, and NJP RRs were identified from a grey literature search of 148 RR producing organizations and were sampled proportionate to cluster size by organization and pro…

research product

MOESM2 of Global mapping of randomised trials related articles published in high-impact-factor medical journals: a cross-sectional analysis

Additional file 2. Data extraction and normalisation processes.

research product

MOESM3 of Global mapping of randomised trials related articles published in high-impact-factor medical journals: a cross-sectional analysis

Additional file 3. Reporting checklist.

research product

Global collaborative networks on meta-analyses of randomized trials published in high impact factor medical journals: a social network analysis

Abstract Background Research collaboration contributes to the advancement of knowledge by exploiting the results of scientific efforts more efficiently, but the global patterns of collaboration on meta-analysis are unknown. The purpose of this research was to describe and characterize the global collaborative patterns in meta-analyses of randomized trials published in high impact factor medical journals over the past three decades. Methods This was a cross-sectional, social network analysis. We searched PubMed for relevant meta-analyses of randomized trials published up to December 2012. We selected meta-analyses (including at least randomized trials as primary evidence source) published in…

research product

The pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatment of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder in children and adolescents: protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

[Background] Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is one of the most common neurodevelopmental disorders of children and adolescents, with a significant impact on health services and the community in terms of economic and social burdens. The objective of this systematic review will be to evaluate the comparative efficacy and safety of pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatments in children and adolescents with ADHD.

research product

MOESM6 of Global mapping of randomised trials related articles published in high-impact-factor medical journals: a cross-sectional analysis

Additional file 6. Exploratory analysis of topical data.

research product

Reproducible research practices, openness and transparency in health economic evaluations: study protocol for a cross-sectional comparative analysis

INTRODUCTION: There has been a growing awareness of the need for rigorously and transparent reported health research, to ensure the reproducibility of studies by future researchers. Health economic evaluations, the comparative analysis of alternative interventions in terms of their costs and consequences, have been promoted as an important tool to inform decision-making. The objective of this study will be to investigate the extent to which articles of economic evaluations of healthcare interventions indexed in MEDLINE incorporate research practices that promote transparency, openness and reproducibility. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This is the study protocol for a cross-sectional comparative ana…

research product

MOESM5 of Global mapping of randomised trials related articles published in high-impact-factor medical journals: a cross-sectional analysis

Additional file 5. List of excluded articles.

research product

MOESM2 of Global mapping of randomised trials related articles published in high-impact-factor medical journals: a cross-sectional analysis

Additional file 2. Data extraction and normalisation processes.

research product

MOESM1 of Global mapping of randomised trials related articles published in high-impact-factor medical journals: a cross-sectional analysis

Additional file 1. Full strategy in PubMed/MEDLINE.

research product

Citations and metrics of journals discontinued from Scopus for publication concerns: the GhoS(t)copus Project [version 2; peer review: 2 approved, 1 approved with reservations]

Background: Scopus is a leading bibliometric database. It contains a large part of the articles cited in peer-reviewed publications. The journals included in Scopus are periodically re-evaluated to ensure they meet indexing criteria and some journals might be discontinued for 'publication concerns'. Previously published articles may remain indexed and can be cited. Their metrics have yet to be studied. This study aimed to evaluate the main features and metrics of journals discontinued from Scopus for publication concerns, before and after their discontinuation, and to determine the extent of predatory journals among the discontinued journals. Methods: We surveyed the list of discontinued jo…

research product

MOESM1 of Global mapping of randomised trials related articles published in high-impact-factor medical journals: a cross-sectional analysis

Additional file 1. Full strategy in PubMed/MEDLINE.

research product

MOESM4 of Global mapping of randomised trials related articles published in high-impact-factor medical journals: a cross-sectional analysis

Additional file 4. List of PMID for included articles.

research product

The pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatment of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder in children and adolescents: A systematic review with network meta-analyses of randomised trials.

Background Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is one of the most commonly diagnosed psychiatric disorders in childhood. A wide variety of treatments have been used for the management of ADHD. We aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of pharmacological, psychological and complementary and alternative medicine interventions for the treatment of ADHD in children and adolescents. Methods and findings We performed a systematic review with network meta-analyses. Randomised controlled trials (≥ 3 weeks follow-up) were identified from published and unpublished sources through searches in PubMed and the Cochrane Library (up to April 7, 2016). Interventions of interest were pharmacolo…

research product

MOESM6 of Global mapping of randomised trials related articles published in high-impact-factor medical journals: a cross-sectional analysis

Additional file 6. Exploratory analysis of topical data.

research product

Global mapping of randomised trials related articles published in high-impact-factor medical journals: a cross-sectional analysis

[Background]: Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) provide the most reliable information to inform clinical practice and patient care. We aimed to map global clinical research publication activity through RCT-related articles in high-impact-factor medical journals over the past five decades.

research product

Epidemiology and Reporting Characteristics of Systematic Reviews of Biomedical Research: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Background Systematic reviews (SRs) can help decision makers interpret the deluge of published biomedical literature. However, a SR may be of limited use if the methods used to conduct the SR are flawed, and reporting of the SR is incomplete. To our knowledge, since 2004 there has been no cross-sectional study of the prevalence, focus, and completeness of reporting of SRs across different specialties. Therefore, the aim of our study was to investigate the epidemiological and reporting characteristics of a more recent cross-section of SRs. Methods and Findings We searched MEDLINE to identify potentially eligible SRs indexed during the month of February 2014. Citations were screened using pre…

research product

Reporting guidelines for health research: protocol for a cross-sectional analysis of the EQUATOR Network Library

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019.

research product

Improving transparency of scientific reporting to increase value and reduce waste in mental health research.

research product

MOESM4 of Global mapping of randomised trials related articles published in high-impact-factor medical journals: a cross-sectional analysis

Additional file 4. List of PMID for included articles.

research product

MOESM3 of Global mapping of randomised trials related articles published in high-impact-factor medical journals: a cross-sectional analysis

Additional file 3. Reporting checklist.

research product

MOESM5 of Global mapping of randomised trials related articles published in high-impact-factor medical journals: a cross-sectional analysis

Additional file 5. List of excluded articles.

research product

Inclusion of predatory journals in Scopus is inflating scholars’ metrics and advancing careers

research product