0000000000534055

AUTHOR

Andrej Markota

showing 2 related works from this author

Correction to: Prevalence, associated factors and outcomes of pressure injuries in adult intensive care unit patients: the DecubICUs study (Intensive…

2021

The original version of this article unfortunately contained a mistake. The members of the ESICM Trials Group Collaborators were not shown in the article but only in the ESM. The full list of collaborators is shown below. The original article has been corrected.

pressure ulcerintensive care
researchProduct

Inhaled isoflurane via the anaesthetic conserving device versus propofol for sedation of invasively ventilated patients in intensive care units in Ge…

2021

Summary Background Previous studies indicate that isoflurane could be useful for the sedation of patients in the intensive care unit (ICU), but prospective studies evaluating isoflurane's efficacy have been small. The aim of this study was to test whether the sedation with isoflurane was non-inferior to sedation with propofol. Methods This phase 3, randomised, controlled, open-label non-inferiority trial evaluated the efficacy and safety of up to 54 h of isoflurane compared with propofol in adults (aged ≥18 years) who were invasively ventilated in ICUs in Germany (21 sites) and Slovenia (three sites). Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to isoflurane inhalation via the Sedaconda anaesthet…

Pulmonary and Respiratory MedicineAdultSedationPopulationSlovenialaw.inventionlawIntensive careGermanyClinical endpointMedicineHumansHypnotics and SedativesProspective StudieseducationProspective cohort studyPropofolAnestheticseducation.field_of_studyIsofluranebusiness.industryIntensive care unitRespiration ArtificialIntensive Care UnitsIsofluraneAnesthesiamedicine.symptombusinessPropofolmedicine.drugThe Lancet. Respiratory medicine
researchProduct