0000000000539725

AUTHOR

Nicolas Say

showing 3 related works from this author

The Psychological Science Accelerator’s COVID-19 rapid-response dataset

2023

Funder: Amazon Web Services (AWS) Imagine Grant

Statistics and Probability223 participants with varying completion rates. Participants completed the survey from 111 geopolitical regions in 44 unique languages/dialects. The anonymized dataset described here is provided in both raw and processed formats to facilitate re-use and further analyses. The dataset offers secondary analytic opportunities to explore copingBF Psychology230 Affective NeuroscienceHealth Behaviorand demographic information for each participant. Each participant started the study with the same general questions and then was randomized to complete either one longer experiment or two shorter experiments. Data were provided by 73Message framingDiseasesLibrary and Information Sciences:Ciências Sociais::Psicologia [Domínio/Área Científica]geographical and cultural context characterizationHV Social pathology. Social and public welfare. CriminologypandemiatEducationa general questionnaire examining health prevention behaviors and COVID-19 experienceddc:150SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-beingRA0421 Public health. Hygiene. Preventive MedicineSurveys and QuestionnairesAdaptation PsychologicalyleiskartoituksetHumansPendienteHealth behaviorsPandemicsframingBehaviour Change and Well-beingEmotion regulationSelf-determination messagingand self-determination across a diverseCOVID-19kansainvälinen vertailuResearch dataComputer Science Applicationswhich can be merged with other time-sampled or geographic data.cognitive reappraisalsglobal sample obtained at the onset of the COVID-19 pandemicterveyskäyttäytyminenIn response to the COVID-19 pandemic/dk/atira/pure/sustainabledevelopmentgoals/good_health_and_well_beingand autonomy framing manipulations on behavioral intentions and affective measures. The data collected (April to October 2020) included specific measures for each experimental studyStatistics Probability and UncertaintyPeople’s healthtutkimusaineistosurvey-tutkimusDatasetInformation Systemsthe Psychological Science Accelerator coordinated three large-scale psychological studies to examine the effects of loss-gain framing
researchProduct

A multi-country test of brief reappraisal interventions on emotions during the COVID-19 pandemic

2021

© The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Limited 2021, corrected publication 2022

MaleSTRESSEmotionsPsychological interventionSocial Sciences[SHS.PSY]Humanities and Social Sciences/PsychologyREAPPRAISAL INTERVENTIONSBehavioral neuroscienceNEGATIVE AND POSITIVE EMOTIONSBehavioral Neuroscience0302 clinical medicineddc:150[STAT.ML]Statistics [stat]/Machine Learning [stat.ML]PandemicPsychologyANXIETYCovid-19 reappraisal emotionsR PACKAGE//purl.org/becyt/ford/5.1 [https]ComputingMilieux_MISCELLANEOUSRepurposingmedia_common//purl.org/becyt/ford/5 [https]05 social sciencesDIVERGENT ASSOCIATIONSPOSITIVE EMOTIONS3. Good health[SCCO.PSYC]Cognitive science/PsychologyMULTI-COUNTRY TESTadult; COVID-19; female; humans; male; emotional regulation; emotions/dk/atira/pure/sustainabledevelopmentgoals/good_health_and_well_beingAnxietyFemaleCOGNITIVE REAPPRAISALPsychological resiliencemedicine.symptomPsychology[STAT.ME]Statistics [stat]/Methodology [stat.ME]Clinical psychologyAdultSocial Psychologymedia_common.quotation_subjectExperimental and Cognitive PsychologyArticle050105 experimental psychologyCognitive reappraisal03 medical and health sciencesSDG 3 - Good Health and Well-beingHuman behaviourmedicineHumans0501 psychology and cognitive sciencesMETAANALYSISBehaviour Change and Well-beingpandemicCOVID-19reappraisalRESILIENCENEGATIVE AFFECTMental healthEmotional RegulationREGULATION STRATEGIES030217 neurology & neurosurgeryNature Human Behaviour
researchProduct

Situational factors shape moral judgements in the trolley dilemma in Eastern, Southern and Western countries in a culturally diverse sample

2022

The study of moral judgements often centres on moral dilemmas in which options consistent with deontological perspectives (that is, emphasizing rules, individual rights and duties) are in conflict with options consistent with utilitarian judgements (that is, following the greater good based on consequences). Greene et al. (2009) showed that psychological and situational factors (for example, the intent of the agent or the presence of physical contact between the agent and the victim) can play an important role in moral dilemma judgements (for example, the trolley problem). Our knowledge is limited concerning both the universality of these effects outside the United States and the impact of …

trolleySituational factorsSDG 16 - PeaceSocial PsychologyIndividualityBFExperimental and Cognitive PsychologyIntentionEasternHMpsychologyMoralsSocial Developmenttrolley dilemmaBehavioral NeuroscienceJudgmentddc:150replicabilitycultural universalityHumansPsychologyPendienteSHAMECONFLICTBehaviour Change and Well-beingphilosophySDG 16 - Peace Justice and Strong Institutionsmoral judgementSDG 10 - Reduced Inequalities/dk/atira/pure/sustainabledevelopmentgoals/peace_justice_and_strong_institutionsJustice and Strong InstitutionsMODELNORMSKnowledgePROCESS DISSOCIATION/dk/atira/pure/sustainabledevelopmentgoals/reduced_inequalitiesmoral judgementsUTILITARIAN JUDGMENTSSettore M-PSI/05 - Psicologia SocialeMoral judgments ; Trolley dilemma ; cultural universality and variations ; replication studyRESPONSES
researchProduct