0000000000605720

AUTHOR

Mike Mesterton-gibbons

showing 2 related works from this author

Escaping the evolutionary trap: Can size-related contest advantage compensate for juvenile mortality disadvantage when parasitoids develop in unnatur…

2021

Abstract The quality of hosts for a parasitoid wasp may be influenced by attributes such as host size or species, with high quality for successful development usually coincident with high quality for larger offspring. This is not always the case: for the Scelionid wasp Trissolcus basalis, oviposition in eggs of the Brown Marmorated Stink Bug, Halyomorpha halys, rather than of the normal host, the Southern Green Stink Bug, Nezara viridula, leads to lower offspring survival, but survivors can be unusually large. Adult female T. basalis engage in contests for host access. As larger contestants are typically favoured in contests between parasitoids, the larger size of surviving offspring may co…

0106 biological sciencesStatistics and ProbabilityAvian clutch sizeHost specieGreen stink bugWaspsZoology010603 evolutionary biology01 natural sciencesReproductive valueGeneral Biochemistry Genetics and Molecular BiologyParasitoid waspHeteropteraAnimalsBrown marmorated stink bugEvolutionarily stable strategyGeneral Immunology and MicrobiologybiologySize advantageHost (biology)AnimalApplied MathematicsReproductionfungiGeneral MedicineTrissolcus basalibiology.organism_classificationBiological EvolutionEurope010602 entomologyHalyomorpha halyEvolutionary trapNezara viridulaModeling and SimulationOwnership advantageBrown Marmorated Stink BugFemaleReproductive valueGeneral Agricultural and Biological SciencesJournal of theoretical biology
researchProduct

Variation between Self- and Mutual Assessment in Animal Contests

2014

Limited resources lead animals into conflicts of interest, which are resolved when an individual withdraws from a direct contest. Current theory suggests that the decision to withdraw can be based on a threshold derived from an individual’s own state (self-assessment) or on a comparison between their own state and their opponent’s (mutual assessment). The observed variation between these assessment strategies in nature does not conform to theory. Thus, we require theoretical developments that explain the functional significance of different assessment strategies. We consider a hawk-dove game with two discrete classes that differ in fighting ability, in which the players strategically decide…

Self-assessmentCompetitive BehaviorComputer sciencePopulationVariation (game tree)CONTESTModels Biologicalstrategic errorMicroeconomicsmutual assessmentAnimalseducationEcology Evolution Behavior and Systematicstietoeducation.field_of_studycontestBehavior AnimalMutual assessmentAdversaryInvestment (macroeconomics)self-assessmentBiological EvolutionAnimal Communicationta1181Functional significancesignaling
researchProduct