0000000000639825
AUTHOR
Benjamin Tournier
Additional file 1: Table S1. of Analysis of RET promoter CpG island methylation using methylation-specific PCR (MSP), pyrosequencing, and methylation-sensitive high-resolution melting (MS-HRM): impact on stage II colon cancer patient outcome
Primer sequences and conditions. Primer pairs were designed near the putative transcriptional start site. (DOCX 17 kb)
Promoter CpG island methylation of RET predicts poor prognosis in stage II colorectal cancer patients
Abstract Improved prognostic stratification of patients with TNM stage II colorectal cancer (CRC) is desired, since 20–30% of high-risk stage II patients may die within five years of diagnosis. This study was conducted to investigate REarranged during Transfection ( RET ) gene promoter CpG island methylation as a possible prognostic marker for TNM stage II CRC patients. The utility of RET promoter CpG island methylation in tumors of stage II CRC patients as a prognostic biomarker for CRC related death was studied in three independent series (including 233, 231, and 294 TNM stage II patients, respectively) by using MSP and pyrosequencing. The prognostic value of RET promoter CpG island methy…
Identification of novel, clonally stable, somatic mutations targeting transcription factors PAX5 and NKX2-3, the epigenetic regulator LRIF1, and BRAF in a case of atypical B-cell chronic lymphocytic leukemia harboring a t(14;18)(q32;q21)
Diagnosis of B-cell chronic lymphocytic leukemia (B-CLL) is usually straightforward, involving clinical, immunophenotypic (Matutes score), and (immuno)genetic analyses (to refine patient prognosis for treatment). CLL cases with atypical presentation (e.g., Matutes ≤ 3) are also encountered, and for these diseases, biology and prognostic impact are less clear. Here we report the genomic characterization of a case of atypical B-CLL in a 70-yr-old male patient; B-CLL cells showed a Matutes score of 3, chromosomal translocation t(14;18)(q32;q21) (BCL2/IGH), mutated IGHV, deletion 17p, and mutations in BCL2, NOTCH1 (subclonal), and TP53 (subclonal). Quite strikingly, a novel PAX5 mutation that w…
Analysis of RET promoter CpG island methylation using methylation-specific PCR (MSP), pyrosequencing, and methylation-sensitive high-resolution melting (MS-HRM): impact on stage II colon cancer patient outcome.
Background Already since the 1990s, promoter CpG island methylation markers have been considered promising diagnostic, prognostic, and predictive cancer biomarkers. However, so far, only a limited number of DNA methylation markers have been introduced into clinical practice. One reason why the vast majority of methylation markers do not translate into clinical applications is lack of independent validation of methylation markers, often caused by differences in methylation analysis techniques. We recently described RET promoter CpG island methylation as a potential prognostic marker in stage II colorectal cancer (CRC) patients of two independent series. Methods In the current study, we analy…
Cancers du côlon : prise en charge moléculaire
Resume Le demembrement moleculaire des cancers et en particulier des cancers colorectaux conduit a des prises en charge de plus en plus adaptees et de plus en plus complexes. Ce demembrement a abouti a de nombreuses classifications et finalement a une classification moleculaire consensuelle en 2015. Cette classification consensuelle reste pour l’instant non utilisable au quotidien. Plusieurs facteurs moleculaires (statut MSS/MSI, statut BRAF, statut RAS) sont desormais indispensables a la prise en charge du cancer colorectal que ce soit en situation adjuvante ou metastatique. D’autres facteurs tels que le statut HER2 et l’expression de mir-31-3p sont regulierement pris en compte au cas par …
Why do results conflict regarding the prognostic value of the methylation status in colon cancers? The role of the preservation method.
Abstract Background In colorectal carcinoma, extensive gene promoter hypermethylation is called the CpG island methylator phenotype (CIMP). Explaining why studies on CIMP and survival yield conflicting results is essential. Most experiments to measure DNA methylation rely on the sodium bisulfite conversion of unmethylated cytosines into uracils. No study has evaluated the performance of bisulfite conversion and methylation levels from matched cryo-preserved and Formalin-Fixed Paraffin Embedded (FFPE) samples using pyrosequencing. Methods Couples of matched cryo-preserved and FFPE samples from 40 colon adenocarcinomas were analyzed. Rates of bisulfite conversion and levels of methylation of …