0000000000844449

AUTHOR

Nicolas Girerd

showing 3 related works from this author

Lung ultrasound in outpatients with heart failure: the wet‐to‐dry HF study

2021

The Nancy team is supported by the RHU Fight-HF, a public grant overseen by the French National Research Agency (ANR) as part of the second 'Investissements d'Avenir' programme (reference: ANR-15-RHUS-0004), by the French PIA project 'Lorraine Université d'Excellence' (reference: ANR-15-IDEX-04-LUE), the ANR FOCUS-MR (reference: ANR-15-CE14-0032-01), ERA-CVD EXPERT (reference: ANR-16-ECVD-0002-02), the Contrat de Plan Etat Lorraine IT2MP, and FEDER Lorraine. Aims: In ambulatory patients with chronic heart failure (HF), congestion and decongestion assessment may be challenging. The aim of this study is to assess the value of lung ultrasound (LUS) in outpatients with HF in characterizing deco…

Malemedicine.medical_specialtyHeart failure030204 cardiovascular system & hematologyPulmonary congestion03 medical and health sciences0302 clinical medicine[SDV.MHEP.CSC]Life Sciences [q-bio]/Human health and pathology/Cardiology and cardiovascular systemInterquartile rangeInternal medicineOutpatientsmedicineHumansDiseases of the circulatory (Cardiovascular) systemDecompensation030212 general & internal medicineLungUltrasonographyHeart FailureLung ultrasoundbusiness.industryHazard ratioOriginal ArticlesPrognosismedicine.diseaseConfidence interval[SDV.MHEP.CSC] Life Sciences [q-bio]/Human health and pathology/Cardiology and cardiovascular system3. Good healthLung ultrasoundRC666-701Heart failureAmbulatoryCardiologyOriginal ArticleFemaleCardiology and Cardiovascular MedicinebusinessAfter treatmentESC Heart Failure
researchProduct

Epinephrine Versus Norepinephrine for Cardiogenic Shock After Acute Myocardial Infarction

2018

IF 16.834 (2017); International audience; BACKGROUND Vasopressor agents could have certain specific effects in patients with cardiogenic shock (CS) after myocardial infarction, which may influence outcome. Although norepinephrine and epinephrine are currently the most commonly used agents, no randomized trial has compared their effects, and intervention data are lacking. OBJECTIVES The goal of this paper was to compare in a prospective, double-blind, multicenter, randomized study, the efficacy and safety of epinephrine and norepinephrine in patients with CS after acute myocardial infarction. METHODS The primary efficacy outcome was cardiac index evolution, and the primary safety outcome was…

MaleInotropeILL PATIENTSCardiac index030204 cardiovascular system & hematologyLACTATE0302 clinical medicine[SDV.MHEP.MI]Life Sciences [q-bio]/Human health and pathology/Infectious diseasesSUPPORTTISSUE OXYGENATIONVasoconstrictor AgentsProspective StudiesMyocardial infarctionCardiogenic shockcardiogenic shockMiddle Aged3. Good healthEpinephrineCardiologyHEARTFemaleTRIALFranceCardiology and Cardiovascular Medicinemedicine.drugmedicine.medical_specialtyShock Cardiogenicacute myocardial infarctionvasopressornorepinephrineEXTRACORPOREAL MEMBRANE-OXYGENATIONNorepinephrine (medication)03 medical and health sciencesDouble-Blind MethodInternal medicineHeart rateMANAGEMENTmedicineHumansepinephrineAgedbusiness.industrySeptic shockMORTALITYSEPTIC SHOCKHemodynamics030208 emergency & critical care medicinemedicine.disease3121 General medicine internal medicine and other clinical medicinebusiness
researchProduct

Proceedings of Réanimation 2017, the French Intensive Care Society International Congress

2017

biologybusiness.industry030208 emergency & critical care medicineLymphocyte proliferationCritical Care and Intensive Care MedicineMeeting Abstractslaw.invention03 medical and health sciencesInterleukin 100302 clinical medicine030228 respiratory systemlawPD-L1ImmunologyPostoperative infectionCardiopulmonary bypassbiology.proteinMedicine030212 general & internal medicinebusinessAnnals of Intensive Care
researchProduct