0000000000962002

AUTHOR

Barbara Loera

0000-0002-4210-1796

showing 2 related works from this author

Not All Academics Are Alike: First Validation of the Academics' Quality of Life at Work Scale (AQoLW)

2018

Background: Relating to the macro-level changes and the increasing complexity of the academic system, a growing number of studies began to investigate the perceived working context impact on well-being and job satisfaction of academics. A unique duality characterizes this context: academics cannot be longer defined as stress-free, but at the same time they are still satisfied and engaged in their work. There is a need to evaluate the academic environment not only in terms of stressor and strain, but also in terms of which experiences are sources of fulfillment. The study aimed to explore psychometric properties of a new instrument (AQoLW) for assessing context-specific features of the acade…

confirmatory factor analysismeasurment invarianceacademic worklcsh:BF1-990Applied psychologyJ-DRStructural equation modelingCronbach's alpha0502 economics and businessPsychologyMeasurement invariancePublic engagementGeneral PsychologyOriginal Research05 social sciencesStressor050301 educationConfirmatory factor analysisAcademic work Confirmatory factor analysis J-DR Measurment invariance Quality of lifelcsh:Psychologyquality of lifeJob satisfactionPsychology0503 education050203 business & managementCareer developmentFrontiers in Psychology
researchProduct

A New Academic Quality at Work Tool (AQ@workT) to Assess the Quality of Life at Work in the Italian Academic Context

2022

Refereed/Peer-reviewed The present study provides evidence for a valid and reliable tool, the Academic Quality at Work Tool (AQ@workT), to investigate the quality of life at work in academics within the Italian university sector. The AQ@workT was developed by the QoL@Work research team, namely a group of expert academics in the field of work and organizational psychology affiliated with the Italian Association of Psychologists. The tool is grounded in the job demands-resources model and its psychometric properties were assessed in three studies comprising a wide sample of lecturers, researchers, and professors: a pilot study (N = 120), a calibration study (N = 1084), and a validation study …

validationHealth Toxicology and MutagenesisPublic Health Environmental and Occupational HealthReproducibility of ResultReproducibility of Resultsacademic teaching staff assessment tool job demands-resources model quality of life in academia validationPilot Projectsjob demands-resources model; quality of life in academia; validation; academic teaching staff;job demands-resources model quality of life in academia validation academic teaching staff assessment tooljob demands-resources model; quality of life in academia; validation; academic teaching staff; assessment tooljob demands-resources modelacademic teaching staff; assessment tool; job demands-resources model; quality of life in academia; validation; Humans; Italy; Pilot Projects; Reproducibility of Results; Surveys and Questionnaires; Quality of LifeItalyacademic teaching staffSurveys and Questionnairesquality of life in academiaQuality of LifeSurveys and QuestionnaireHumansPilot Projectassessment toolHumanInternational Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
researchProduct