0000000001068348

AUTHOR

N. Salahuddin

showing 3 related works from this author

Correction to: Potentially modifiable factors contributing to outcome from acute respiratory distress syndrome: the LUNG SAFE study (Intensive Care M…

2018

The members of the LUNG SAFE Investigators and the ESICM Trials Group were provided in such a way that they could not be indexed as collaborators on PubMed. The publisher apologizes for this error.

Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine
researchProduct

Resolved versus confirmed ARDS after 24 h: insights from the LUNG SAFE study

2018

Purpose: To evaluate patients with resolved versus confirmed ARDS, identify subgroups with substantial mortality risk, and to determine the utility of day 2 ARDS reclassification. Methods: Our primary objective, in this secondary LUNG SAFE analysis, was to compare outcome in patients with resolved versus confirmed ARDS after 24 h. Secondary objectives included identifying factors associated with ARDS persistence and mortality, and the utility of day 2 ARDS reclassification. Results: Of 2377 patients fulfilling the ARDS definition on the first day of ARDS (day 1) and receiving invasive mechanical ventilation, 503 (24%) no longer fulfilled the ARDS definition the next day, 52% of whom initial…

MaleARDSmedicine.medical_treatmentlnfectious Diseases and Global Health Radboud Institute for Molecular Life Sciences [Radboudumc 4]ARDS reassessment; ARDS Survival; Berlin criteria ARDS; Persisting ARDS;Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicineassisted ventilation0302 clinical medicineRisk Factors030212 general & internal medicinerisk factor AdultTidal volumecomparative studyeducation.field_of_studyRespiratory Distress SyndromeMortality rateRemission Inductiontidal volumeARDS reassessment; ARDS Survival; Berlin criteria ARDS; Persisting ARDS; Critical Care and Intensive Care MedicineARDS reassessmentartificial ventilationclinical trialimmunosuppressive treatmentadult respiratory distress syndromeMiddle AgedARDS SurvivalMonte Carlo methodmedicine.anatomical_structureclassificationpositive end expiratory pressureCardiologyDisease ProgressionSOFA scoredisease severityFemaleAdultmedicine.medical_specialtyPopulationdisease classificationArticleNO03 medical and health sciencesremissionlength of stayAnesthesiologyInternal medicinemedicinepneumoniaSequential Organ Failure Assessment ScoreHumanshumaneducationAgedMechanical ventilationhospital mortalityLungbusiness.industryRisk Factordisease associationRespiratory Distress Syndrome AdultPersisting ARDSmedicine.diseasemajor clinical studymortalityRespiration Artificialbreathing rate030228 respiratory systemdisease exacerbationBerlin criteria ARDSbusinessIntensive care medicine
researchProduct

Erratum to: The Intensive Care Global Study on Severe Acute Respiratory Infection (IC‑GLOSSARI): a multicenter, multinational, 14-day inception coh…

2018

In both the original publication (DOI 10.1007/s00134-015-4206-2) and the first erratum (DOI 10.1007/s00134-016-4317-4), the members of the IC-GLOSSARI Investigators and the ESICM Trials Group were provided in such a way that they could not be indexed as collaborators on PubMed. The publisher apologizes for these errors and is pleased to list the members of the groups here: (Table presented.).

Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine
researchProduct