0000000001147482

AUTHOR

Hamid Reza Mirzaei

showing 3 related works from this author

The global burden of cancer attributable to risk factors, 2010–19 : A systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019

2022

Background: Understanding the magnitude of cancer burden attributable to potentially modifiable risk factors is crucial for development of effective prevention and mitigation strategies. We analysed results from the Global Burden of Diseases, Injuries, and Risk Factors Study (GBD) 2019 to inform cancer control planning efforts globally. Methods: The GBD 2019 comparative risk assessment framework was used to estimate cancer burden attributable to behavioural, environmental and occupational, and metabolic risk factors. A total of 82 risk-outcome pairs were included on the basis of the World Cancer Research Fund criteria. Estimated cancer deaths and disability-adjusted life-years (DALYs) in 20…

MaleDEATHSDALY cancer risk factorsMedizinsystematic analysisGlobal HealthRisk AssessmentCancer preventionGlobal Burden of DiseaseRC0254Risk-attributable cancer deathsSDG 3 - Good Health and Well-beingRA0421Risk FactorsRA0421 Public health. Hygiene. Preventive MedicineQuality-Adjusted Life YearNeoplasmscancerHumansGlobal Burden of Disease StudyUKMedicine(all)MCCRC0254 Neoplasms. Tumors. Oncology (including Cancer)Risk FactorSmokingCOVID-193rd-DASGeneral MedicineDisability-adjusted life-yearsSOCIAL DETERMINANTSRisk assessmentsrisk factorCardiovascular and Metabolic Diseases3121 General medicine internal medicine and other clinical medicineOBESITYCancer burden/dk/atira/pure/sustainabledevelopmentgoals/good_health_and_well_beingNeoplasmFemaleLIFE-STYLEQuality-Adjusted Life YearsHEALTHRAHumanRC
researchProduct

Guidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy (4th edition) 1

2021

Contains fulltext : 232759.pdf (Publisher’s version ) (Closed access) In 2008, we published the first set of guidelines for standardizing research in autophagy. Since then, this topic has received increasing attention, and many scientists have entered the field. Our knowledge base and relevant new technologies have also been expanding. Thus, it is important to formulate on a regular basis updated guidelines for monitoring autophagy in different organisms. Despite numerous reviews, there continues to be confusion regarding acceptable methods to evaluate autophagy, especially in multicellular eukaryotes. Here, we present a set of guidelines for investigators to select and interpret methods to…

0301 basic medicineProgrammed cell deathSettore BIO/06AutophagosomeAutolysosome[SDV]Life Sciences [q-bio]lnfectious Diseases and Global Health Radboud Institute for Molecular Life Sciences [Radboudumc 4]Autophagy-Related ProteinsReviewComputational biology[SDV.BC]Life Sciences [q-bio]/Cellular BiologyBiologySettore MED/0403 medical and health sciencesstressChaperone-mediated autophagyddc:570AutophagyLC3AnimalsHumanscancerSettore BIO/10Autophagosome; cancer; flux; LC3; lysosome; macroautophagy; neurodegeneration; phagophore; stress; vacuoleSet (psychology)Molecular Biologyvacuole.phagophore030102 biochemistry & molecular biologyvacuolebusiness.industryInterpretation (philosophy)AutophagyAutophagosomesneurodegenerationCell BiologyfluxMulticellular organismmacroautophagy030104 developmental biologyKnowledge baselysosomeAutophagosome; LC3; cancer; flux; lysosome; macroautophagy; neurodegeneration; phagophore; stress; vacuoleBiological AssayLysosomesbusinessBiomarkers[SDV.MHEP]Life Sciences [q-bio]/Human health and pathology
researchProduct

Autophagy

2021

In 2008, we published the first set of guidelines for standardizing research in autophagy. Since then, this topic has received increasing attention, and many scientists have entered the field. Our knowledge base and relevant new technologies have also been expanding. Thus, it is important to formulate on a regular basis updated guidelines for monitoring autophagy in different organisms. Despite numerous reviews, there continues to be confusion regarding acceptable methods to evaluate autophagy, especially in multicellular eukaryotes. Here, we present a set of guidelines for investigators to select and interpret methods to examine autophagy and related processes, and for reviewers to provide…

macroautophagy;autophagyAutophagosome[SDV]Life Sciences [q-bio]canceLC3 macroautophagyautophagosomeneurodegeneration;[SDV.BC]Life Sciences [q-bio]/Cellular BiologyAutophagy AutophagosomeNOstress vacuolestressautophagic processesstrerfluxLC3cancerguidelinesAutophagosome; cancer; flux; LC3; lysosome; macroautophagy; neurodegeneration; phagophore; stress; vacuoleSettore BIO/06 - Anatomia Comparata E Citologia[SDV.BC] Life Sciences [q-bio]/Cellular BiologyComputingMilieux_MISCELLANEOUSMedaka oryzias latipesphagophorevacuoleQHneurodegenerationAutophagosome cancer flux LC3 lysosome macroautophagy neurodegeneration phagophore stress vacuoleautophagy; autophagic processes; guidelines; autophagosome; cancer; flux; LC3; lysosome; macroautophagy; neurodegeneration; phagophore; stress; vacuolefluxmacroautophagystress.lysosomeAutophagosome; LC3; cancer; flux; lysosome; macroautophagy; neurodegeneration; phagophore; stress; vacuoleSettore BIO/17 - ISTOLOGIARC
researchProduct