0000000001186813
AUTHOR
David Moher
showing 26 related works from this author
Citations and metrics of journals discontinued from Scopus for publication concerns: the GhoS(t)copus Project
2020
Background: Scopus is a leading bibliometric database. It contains a large part of the articles cited in peer-reviewed publications. The journals included in Scopus are periodically re-evaluated to ensure they meet indexing criteria and some journals might be discontinued for 'publication concerns'. Previously published articles may remain indexed and can be cited. Their metrics have yet to be studied. This study aimed to evaluate the main features and metrics of journals discontinued from Scopus for publication concerns, before and after their discontinuation, and to determine the extent of predatory journals among the discontinued journals. Methods: We surveyed the list of discontinued jo…
Predatory journals enter biomedical databases through public funding
2020
Predatory publishing is an international, cross disciplinary threat to the integrity of the scientific system • A worrying number of articles published in predatory journals are indexed in biomedical databases such as PubMed, the free access biomedical database maintained by the National Library of Medicine • Public funding, under open access policies, seems to be the mechanism by which articles are displayed in PubMed. • Providing guidance to publicly funded authors on how to publish their work in legitimate open-access venues will likely stop the wasteful use of public money to cover the fees of predatory journals.
Inflated citations and metrics of journals discontinued from Scopus for publication concerns: the GhoS(t)copus Project
2020
AbstractBackgroundScopus is a leading bibliometric database. It contains the largest number of articles cited in peer-reviewed publications. The journals included in Scopus are periodically re-evaluated to ensure they meet indexing criteria and some journals might be discontinued for publication concerns. These journals remain indexed and can be cited. Their metrics have yet to be studied. This study aimed to evaluate the main features and metrics of journals discontinued from Scopus for publication concerns, before and after their discontinuation, and to determine the extent of predatory journals among the discontinued journals.MethodsWe surveyed the list of discontinued journals from Scop…
Assessing the format and content of journal published and non-journal published rapid review reports: A comparative study
2020
Background As production of rapid reviews (RRs) increases in healthcare, knowing how to efficiently convey RR evidence to various end-users is important given they are often intended to directly inform decision-making. Little is known about how often RRs are produced in the published or unpublished domains, and what and how information is structured. Objectives To compare and contrast report format and content features of journal-published (JP) and non-journal published (NJP) RRs. Methods JP RRs were identified from key databases, and NJP RRs were identified from a grey literature search of 148 RR producing organizations and were sampled proportionate to cluster size by organization and pro…
Global collaborative networks on meta-analyses of randomized trials published in high impact factor medical journals: a social network analysis
2014
Abstract Background Research collaboration contributes to the advancement of knowledge by exploiting the results of scientific efforts more efficiently, but the global patterns of collaboration on meta-analysis are unknown. The purpose of this research was to describe and characterize the global collaborative patterns in meta-analyses of randomized trials published in high impact factor medical journals over the past three decades. Methods This was a cross-sectional, social network analysis. We searched PubMed for relevant meta-analyses of randomized trials published up to December 2012. We selected meta-analyses (including at least randomized trials as primary evidence source) published in…
The pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatment of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder in children and adolescents: protocol for a systema…
2015
[Background] Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is one of the most common neurodevelopmental disorders of children and adolescents, with a significant impact on health services and the community in terms of economic and social burdens. The objective of this systematic review will be to evaluate the comparative efficacy and safety of pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatments in children and adolescents with ADHD.
Reproducible research practices, openness and transparency in health economic evaluations: study protocol for a cross-sectional comparative analysis
2020
INTRODUCTION: There has been a growing awareness of the need for rigorously and transparent reported health research, to ensure the reproducibility of studies by future researchers. Health economic evaluations, the comparative analysis of alternative interventions in terms of their costs and consequences, have been promoted as an important tool to inform decision-making. The objective of this study will be to investigate the extent to which articles of economic evaluations of healthcare interventions indexed in MEDLINE incorporate research practices that promote transparency, openness and reproducibility. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This is the study protocol for a cross-sectional comparative ana…
Citations and metrics of journals discontinued from Scopus for publication concerns: the GhoS(t)copus Project [version 2; peer review: 2 approved, 1 …
2020
Background: Scopus is a leading bibliometric database. It contains a large part of the articles cited in peer-reviewed publications. The journals included in Scopus are periodically re-evaluated to ensure they meet indexing criteria and some journals might be discontinued for 'publication concerns'. Previously published articles may remain indexed and can be cited. Their metrics have yet to be studied. This study aimed to evaluate the main features and metrics of journals discontinued from Scopus for publication concerns, before and after their discontinuation, and to determine the extent of predatory journals among the discontinued journals. Methods: We surveyed the list of discontinued jo…
The pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatment of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder in children and adolescents: A systematic review wi…
2017
Background Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is one of the most commonly diagnosed psychiatric disorders in childhood. A wide variety of treatments have been used for the management of ADHD. We aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of pharmacological, psychological and complementary and alternative medicine interventions for the treatment of ADHD in children and adolescents. Methods and findings We performed a systematic review with network meta-analyses. Randomised controlled trials (≥ 3 weeks follow-up) were identified from published and unpublished sources through searches in PubMed and the Cochrane Library (up to April 7, 2016). Interventions of interest were pharmacolo…
Global mapping of randomised trials related articles published in high-impact-factor medical journals: a cross-sectional analysis
2020
[Background]: Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) provide the most reliable information to inform clinical practice and patient care. We aimed to map global clinical research publication activity through RCT-related articles in high-impact-factor medical journals over the past five decades.
Epidemiology and Reporting Characteristics of Systematic Reviews of Biomedical Research: A Cross-Sectional Study.
2016
Background Systematic reviews (SRs) can help decision makers interpret the deluge of published biomedical literature. However, a SR may be of limited use if the methods used to conduct the SR are flawed, and reporting of the SR is incomplete. To our knowledge, since 2004 there has been no cross-sectional study of the prevalence, focus, and completeness of reporting of SRs across different specialties. Therefore, the aim of our study was to investigate the epidemiological and reporting characteristics of a more recent cross-section of SRs. Methods and Findings We searched MEDLINE to identify potentially eligible SRs indexed during the month of February 2014. Citations were screened using pre…
Reporting guidelines for health research: protocol for a cross-sectional analysis of the EQUATOR Network Library
2019
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019.
Improving transparency of scientific reporting to increase value and reduce waste in mental health research.
2015
Inclusion of predatory journals in Scopus is inflating scholars’ metrics and advancing careers
2019
MOESM2 of Global mapping of randomised trials related articles published in high-impact-factor medical journals: a cross-sectional analysis
2020
Additional file 2. Data extraction and normalisation processes.
MOESM3 of Global mapping of randomised trials related articles published in high-impact-factor medical journals: a cross-sectional analysis
2020
Additional file 3. Reporting checklist.
MOESM6 of Global mapping of randomised trials related articles published in high-impact-factor medical journals: a cross-sectional analysis
2020
Additional file 6. Exploratory analysis of topical data.
MOESM5 of Global mapping of randomised trials related articles published in high-impact-factor medical journals: a cross-sectional analysis
2020
Additional file 5. List of excluded articles.
MOESM2 of Global mapping of randomised trials related articles published in high-impact-factor medical journals: a cross-sectional analysis
2020
Additional file 2. Data extraction and normalisation processes.
MOESM1 of Global mapping of randomised trials related articles published in high-impact-factor medical journals: a cross-sectional analysis
2020
Additional file 1. Full strategy in PubMed/MEDLINE.
MOESM1 of Global mapping of randomised trials related articles published in high-impact-factor medical journals: a cross-sectional analysis
2020
Additional file 1. Full strategy in PubMed/MEDLINE.
MOESM4 of Global mapping of randomised trials related articles published in high-impact-factor medical journals: a cross-sectional analysis
2020
Additional file 4. List of PMID for included articles.
MOESM6 of Global mapping of randomised trials related articles published in high-impact-factor medical journals: a cross-sectional analysis
2020
Additional file 6. Exploratory analysis of topical data.
MOESM4 of Global mapping of randomised trials related articles published in high-impact-factor medical journals: a cross-sectional analysis
2020
Additional file 4. List of PMID for included articles.
MOESM3 of Global mapping of randomised trials related articles published in high-impact-factor medical journals: a cross-sectional analysis
2020
Additional file 3. Reporting checklist.
MOESM5 of Global mapping of randomised trials related articles published in high-impact-factor medical journals: a cross-sectional analysis
2020
Additional file 5. List of excluded articles.