0000000001228247

AUTHOR

Ane T Laugen

0000-0001-6196-8304

showing 3 related works from this author

Stillehavsøsters i Norden. Datainnsamling og bestandsvurderinger som grunnlag for forvaltning og høsting av nordiske bestander av stillehavsøsters, C…

2022

VDP::Matematikk og Naturvitenskap: 400VDP::Landbruks- og Fiskerifag: 900::Fiskerifag: 920
researchProduct

Sperm competition in yellow dung flies: No consistent effect of sperm size

2022

The male competition for fertilization that results from female multiple mating promotes the evolution of increased sperm numbers and can impact sperm morphology, with theory predicting that longer sperm can at times be advantageous during sperm competition. If so, males with longer sperm should sire more offspring than competitors with shorter sperm. Few studies have directly tested this prediction, and findings are inconsistent. Here we assessed whether longer sperm provide a competitive advantage in the yellow dung fly (Scathophaga stercoraria; Diptera: Scathophagidae). Initially, we let brothers with different temperature-mediated mean sperm lengths compete - thus minimizing confounding…

MaleEcologyEvolutionMonophenol MonooxygenaseDipteraReproductionVDP::Matematikk og Naturvitenskap: 400Spermatozoa10127 Institute of Evolutionary Biology and Environmental Studies1105 Ecology Evolution Behavior and SystematicsBehavior and SystematicsSemen570 Life sciences; biology590 Animals (Zoology)AnimalsFemaleEcology Evolution Behavior and Systematics
researchProduct

Improving scientific rigour in conservation evaluations and a plea deal for transparency on potential biases

2020

Abstract The delivery of rigorous and unbiased evidence on the effects of interventions lay at the heart of the scientific method. Here we examine scientific papers evaluating agri‐environment schemes, the principal instrument to mitigate farmland biodiversity declines worldwide. Despite previous warnings about rudimentary study designs in this field, we found that the majority of studies published between 2008 and 2017 still lack robust study designs to strictly evaluate intervention effects. Potential sources of bias that arise from the correlative nature are rarely mentioned, and results are still promoted by using a causal language. This lack of robust study designs likely results from …

0106 biological sciencesagri‐environment schemelcsh:QH1-199.5Psychological interventionIntervention effectlcsh:General. Including nature conservation geographical distribution010603 evolutionary biology01 natural sciencesRigourPleaorganic farmingbefore after control impactVDP::Matematikk og Naturvitenskap: 400::Basale biofag: 470Ecology Evolution Behavior and SystematicsNature and Landscape ConservationEcology010604 marine biology & hydrobiologyClinical study designevaluation of conservation interventionsPrincipal (computer security)biodiversity | causal languageRisk analysis (engineering)meta‐analysisMeta-analysisTransparency (graphic)PsychologyConservation Letters
researchProduct