0000000001263500
AUTHOR
Rosciglione C.
La concezione nietzscheana della storia tra vita e scienza.
The topic of this contribution is Nietzsche’s interpretation of history. I put forth an analysis of Nietzsche’s view on the role history plays in the life of human beings, based on Second Untimely that, according to its title, deals with the use and abuse of history for life. In particular, I dwell on what Nietzsche claims about the first part of this title, that is the use of history for life. I argue that far from denying history a role in the life of human beings, the pragmatist stance of Nietzsche’s view allows him to consider history, intended as memory and past re- molded for the future, from within the life of man, which is complex and varied.
Intenzionalità collettiva versus plural subject nel confronto tra Searle e Gilbert: influssi hobbesiani e rousseauiani nel dibattito contemporaneo su individualismo e collettivismo
At which conditions are we allowed to take a plurality of individuals as a collective or a social group? In this paper I address that question by considering the relationship between individuals and collectivity under the respect of the process by which the collectivity is being formed. I will take into account Margaret Gilbert’s theory of joint commitment and plural subject and John Searle’s theory of collective intentionality. In particular I will discuss their view on the phrase «individuals as a group», which bears an intrinsic tension between the individuals, treated as manifold and plural entities, and the group, treated as one singular entity. These theories do hold in common the att…