6533b7cffe1ef96bd12597b0

RESEARCH PRODUCT

Nursing Taxonomies in Spain: Research Themes Presented at the AENTDE Conferences Over a 16-Year Period

Aurora Quero-rufiánSilamani J.a. Guirao-gorisSusana Martín-iglesiasJuan Francisco Roldán MerinoMaria Teresa Lluch-canut

subject

03 medical and health sciences0302 clinical medicine030504 nursingResearch and TheoryNursingbusiness.industryBasic researchMedicineFundamentals and skills030212 general & internal medicine0305 other medical sciencebusinessNursing diagnosis

description

Objective To identify the types of studies of nursing taxonomies and priority research themes presented at AENTDE conferences between 1996 and 2012. Method Four hundred oral communications and posters and 27 lectures presented at the AENTDE meetings were reviewed by means of a descriptive analysis of the types of studies conducted and a content analysis of priority research themes. Results The most commonly presented studies were descriptions of the implementation of nursing taxonomies, which accounted for 27.4% of the total over the 16-year period. However, their prevalence fell from 31.8% in 1996 to 9.1% in 2012. Basic research studies accounted for 17.4% of studies overall but were the most frequent in 2012, when their proportion had risen to 37.5%. Conclusion The prevalence of basic research studies increased notably over the 16-year period. Content validity studies rose in number, while face validity studies fell. Studies of the practical implementation of taxonomies also declined. Objetivo Identificar los tipos de estudios de taxonomias enfermeras y los temas de investigacion prioritarios presentados en las convenciones de AENTDE desde 1996 a 2012. METODO: Se revisaron 400 comunicaciones y 27 ponencias presentadas a 9 simposiums de AENTDE realizando un analisis del tipo de estudio y un analisis de contenido de los temas. Resultados Los estudios mas frecuentes son las experiencias de implantacion de las taxonomias enfermeras con un porcentaje medio de un 27.4% que partiendo de un 31.8% en 1996 disminuyo a un 9,1% en 2012. La investigacion basica tienen un porcentaje medio del 17.4% obteniendose el mayor porcentaje en 2012 con un 37,5%. CONCLUSION: La prevalencia de los estudios de investigacion basica se incremento notablemente durante el periodo de 16 anos. Los estudios de validez de contenido aumentaron en numero, mientras que los estudios de validez aparente cayeron. Los estudios sobre la aplicacion practica de las taxonomias tambien disminuyeron.

https://doi.org/10.1111/2047-3095.12130