6533b7d0fe1ef96bd1259bb5
RESEARCH PRODUCT
Testing-the-Waters Policy With Hypothetical Investment: Evidence From Equity Crowdfunding
Douglas J. CummingDouglas J. CummingFabrice HervéArmin SchwienbacherElodie Manthésubject
FinanceEconomics and Econometrics050208 financeHypothetical biasbusiness.industrymedia_common.quotation_subject05 social sciencesInvestment (macroeconomics)Trust[SHS.ECO]Humanities and Social Sciences/Economics and FinanceEntrepreneurial financeEquity crowdfundingVoting0502 economics and businessEquity crowdfundingVotingBusiness and International Managementbusiness050203 business & managementDigitizationmedia_commondescription
International audience; Digitization has enabled “testing-the-waters” in entrepreneurial finance whereby investors can make nonbinding commitments in equity crowdfunding prior to an actual campaign to ascertain interest in the project. We consider whether these nonbinding equity investment commitments are informative about actual investments during the campaign and, thus, ultimate startup funding success. The data indicate that only 18% of nonbinding commitments are, in fact, invested. The evidence is consistent with hypothetical bias. Hypothetical bias is significantly less pronounced among women and among investors living in higher income areas or in areas with higher levels of education. While investment intentions are only partially reliable at the individual level, the aggregate amount of collected investment intentions is a strong predictor of campaign success. We investigate alternative reasons for withdrawals, such as lying and informational motives, both of which we find implausible alternatives to hypothetical bias.
year | journal | country | edition | language |
---|---|---|---|---|
2020-07-14 |