6533b7d0fe1ef96bd125b04e
RESEARCH PRODUCT
L’ordinaire de la littérature. Des bénéfices pragmatistes dans les études littéraires
Thomas MondéméFlorent Costesubject
[SHS.LITT]Humanities and Social Sciences/Literaturepragmatism0507 social and economic geography050701 cultural studies060104 historylcsh:Social SciencesRorty (Richard)Goodman (Nelson)0601 history and archaeology[SHS.LANGUE]Humanities and Social Sciences/LinguisticsusesRorty RichardPhilosophy05 social sciencesliterature06 humanities and the arts[ SHS.LITT ] Humanities and Social Sciences/Literature[ SHS.ART ] Humanities and Social Sciences/Art and art history16. Peace & justicelcsh:HGoodman Nelsonpragmatisme[ SHS.PHIL ] Humanities and Social Sciences/Philosophy[ SHS.LANGUE ] Humanities and Social Sciences/LinguisticslittératureusagesHumanitiesdescription
International audience; This paper tries to examine why pragmatism, though often evoked and used in numerous academic fields, has had very little influence on French literary studies. To explain such a fact, the authors lay emphasis on the way the concept of literature was coined from romantic and structuralist elements in the French context. Doing so, they also suggest a few insights about what pragmatism could bring to literary studies and criticism, especially concerning the uses of literature, and its cognitive powers.; En dépit du reflux du structuralisme, la littérature continue d’être appréhendée à travers un prisme théorique d’obédience post-romantique, qui occulte son interaction avec notre expérience ordinaire et l’exclut ainsi de la cité. Après examen de certaines conséquences de ce prisme sur le concept de littérature, on se propose de tracer ici quelques pistes pragmatistes susceptibles d’aider à penser la relation constitutive entre les usages que nous faisons de la littérature, le champ de la pratique et la cognition.
| year | journal | country | edition | language |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008-04-01 |