6533b7d1fe1ef96bd125c288
RESEARCH PRODUCT
The effect of visual focus on spatio-temporal and kinematic parameters of treadmill running
Alberto Encarnación-martínezJose Ignacio Priego QuesadaAngel Gabriel Lucas-cuevasMartin LewisPedro Pérez-sorianoJosh Goodingsubject
AdultMalemedicine.medical_specialtygenetic structuresAccelerationBiophysicsSTRIDEFixation OcularKinematicsRunningYoung Adult03 medical and health sciences0302 clinical medicinemedicineHumansOrthopedics and Sports MedicineTibiaTreadmillGaitRehabilitationBiomechanics030229 sport sciencesGazeGaitBiomechanical Phenomenamedicine.anatomical_structureLower ExtremityTime and Motion StudiesExercise TestPhysical therapyAnklePsychologyhuman activities030217 neurology & neurosurgerydescription
The characteristics of a treadmill and the environment where it is based could influence the user’s gaze and have an effect on their running kinematics and lower limb impacts. The aim of this study was to identify the effect of visual focus on spatio-temporal parameters and lower limb kinematics during treadmill running. Twenty six experienced runners ran at 3.33 m s−1 on a treadmill under two visual conditions, either looking ahead at a wall or looking down at the treadmill visual display. Spatio-temporal parameters, impact accelerations of the head and tibia, and knee and ankle kinematics were measured for the final 15 s of a 90 s bout of running under each condition. At the end of the test, participants reported their preference for the visual conditions assessed. Participants’ stride angle, flight time, knee flexion during the flight phase, and ankle eversion during contact time were increased when runners directed visual focus toward the wall compared to the treadmill display (p 0.05). However, the effect size of all biomechanical alterations was small. The Treadmill condition was the preferred condition by the participants (p < 0.001; ESw = 1.0). The results of the current study indicate that runners had a greater mass centre vertical displacement when they ran looking ahead, probably with the aim of compensating for reduced visual feedback, which resulted in larger head accelerations. Greater knee flexion during the flight phase and ankle eversion during the contact time were suggested as compensatory mechanisms for lower limb impacts.
year | journal | country | edition | language |
---|---|---|---|---|
2017-07-15 | Gait & Posture |