6533b7d1fe1ef96bd125c3a6

RESEARCH PRODUCT

New VR magnification ratios of QSO 0957+561

Luis J. GoicoecheaEvencio MediavillaR. Gil-merinoJ. González-cadeloA. UllánJ. A. MuñozMiquel Serra-ricartAlejandro Oscoz

subject

PhysicsExtinction (astronomy)Continuum (design consultancy)Astrophysics (astro-ph)FOS: Physical sciencesAstronomy and AstrophysicsAstrophysicsAstrophysics::Cosmology and Extragalactic AstrophysicsLight curveGravitational microlensingAstrophysicsGalaxyLyman limitNordic Optical TelescopeWavelengthSpace and Planetary ScienceAstrophysics::Earth and Planetary AstrophysicsAstrophysics::Galaxy Astrophysics

description

We present VR magnification ratios of QSO 0957+561, which are inferred from the GLITP light curves of Q0957+561A and new frames taken with the 2.56m Nordic Optical Telescope about 14 months after the GLITP monitoring. From two photometric approaches and a reasonable range for the time delay in the system (415-430 days), we do not obtain achromatic optical continuum ratios, but ratios depending on the wavelength. These new measurements are consistent with differential extinction in the lens galaxy, the Lyman limit system, the damped Ly-alpha system, or the host galaxy of the QSO. The possible values for the differential extinction and the ratio of total to selective extinction in the V band are reasonable. Moreover, crude probability arguments suggest that the ray paths of the two components cross a similar dusty environment, including a network of compact dust clouds and compact dust voids. As an alternative (in fact, the usual interpretation of the old ratios), we also try to explain the new ratios as caused by gravitational microlensing in the deflector. From magnification maps for each of the gravitationally lensed images, using different fractions of the surface mass density represented by the microlenses, as well as different sizes and profiles of the V-band and R-band sources, several synthetic distributions of V-band and R-band ratios are derived. In some gravitational scenarios, there is an apparent disagreement between the observed pair of ratios and the simulated distributions. However, several microlensing pictures work well. To decide between either extinction, or microlensing, or a mixed scenario (extinction + microlensing), new observational and interpretation efforts are required.

https://dx.doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.astro-ph/0409763