6533b7d4fe1ef96bd1261e6d

RESEARCH PRODUCT

Do Grading Gray Stimuli Help to Encode Letter Position?

Ana MarcetManuel PereaMaría Fernández-lópezAna BacieroPablo Gomez

subject

Cognitive Neurosciencemedia_common.quotation_subjectBigramSpeech recognitionword recognition050105 experimental psychologyorthographic processingVisual ObjectsPerceptionperceptual factorsLexical decision task0501 psychology and cognitive sciencesControl (linguistics)lcsh:QH301-705.5computer.programming_languagemedia_commonlexical decisionCommunication05 social sciences050301 educationCell BiologySensory SystemsPseudowordOphthalmologylcsh:Biology (General)letter position codingWord recognitionPsychology0503 educationcomputerOptometryCoding (social sciences)

description

Numerous experiments in the past decades recurrently showed that a transposed-letter pseudoword (e.g., JUGDE) is much more wordlike than a replacement-letter control (e.g., JUPTE). Critically, there is an ongoing debate as to whether this effect arises at a perceptual level (e.g., perceptual uncertainty at assigning letter position of an array of visual objects) or at an abstract language-specific level (e.g., via a level of “open bigrams” between the letter and word levels). Here, we designed an experiment to test the limits of perceptual accounts of letter position coding. The stimuli in a lexical decision task were presented either with a homogeneous letter intensity or with a graded gray intensity, which indicated an unambiguous letter order. The pseudowords were either transposed-letter pseudowords or replaced-letter pseudowords (e.g., jugde vs. jupte). The results showed much longer response times and substantially more errors in the transposed-letter pseudowords than in the replacement-letter pseudowords, regardless of visual format. These findings favor the idea that language-specific orthographic element factors play an essential role when encoding letter position during word recognition.

10.3390/vision5010012http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC8005957