6533b7d4fe1ef96bd1262862
RESEARCH PRODUCT
Constitutional rules and competitive politics: their effects on secessionism
Albert BretonPierre Salmonsubject
Public economicsConstitutional economicsSecessionismmedia_common.quotation_subjectPolitical competitionContext (language use)Public good[SHS.ECO]Humanities and Social Sciences/Economics and Finance[SHS.SCIPO]Humanities and Social Sciences/Political scienceConstitutional economicsCompetition (economics)NegotiationPoliticsGoods and servicesDeclaration of independencePolitical science[ SHS.ECO ] Humanities and Social Sciences/Economies and finances[SHS.ECO] Humanities and Social Sciences/Economics and Finance[SHS.SCIPO] Humanities and Social Sciences/Political science[ SHS.SCIPO ] Humanities and Social Sciences/Political scienceLaw and economicsmedia_commondescription
Albert Breton and Pierre Salmon argue that the effects of constitutiona l rules depend on the nature of political competition and on some meta-rules that contain procedures regulating the application and the modification of constitutiona l rules. They outline two models of competition - electoral competition and compound government competition - and describe the nature of the transactions between the parties involved in the two corresponding settings. In both, the transactions are over constitutional rules and ordinary goods and services, all of which are arguments in the utility functions of citizens. To make the discussion more concrete, the paper focuses on the demand for political autonomy, a variable which, at the limit, becomes a demand for secession and independence. This allows the specification of some meta-rules applicable to secessionism. In this particular context, it appears that relatively small differences in the content of the meta-rules lead to large differences in equilibrium outcomes.
year | journal | country | edition | language |
---|---|---|---|---|
2002-06-01 |