6533b7d7fe1ef96bd1267a5a

RESEARCH PRODUCT

Did the three little pigs frighten the wolf? How deaf readers use lexical and syntactic cues to comprehend sentences

Antonio FerrerInmaculada FajardoNadina Gómez-merino

subject

Wolvesmedia_common.quotation_subjectEye movementMean agePreferenceSemanticsClinical PsychologyReadingActive voiceReading (process)Developmental and Educational PsychologyAnimalsHumansSentence readingEye trackingCuesComprehensionPsychologyLanguageMeaning (linguistics)Cognitive psychologymedia_common

description

Abstract Background The ways in which students with deafness process syntactic and semantic cues while reading sentences are unclear. While some studies have supported the preference for semantic cues, others have not. Aim To examine differences in the processing of syntactic versus semantic cues during sentence reading among students who are deaf or hard of hearing (DHH). Method Twenty DHH students (mean age = 12.48 years) and 20 chronologically age-matched students with typical hearing (TH) were asked to read sentences written in Spanish with different grammatical structures and to choose the picture that best matched the sentences’ meaning while their eye movements were being registered. The picture options were manipulated so that, in addition to the correct ones, there were lexical distractors and syntactic distractors. Results The TH participants outperformed the DHH participants in reading complex sentences but not simple sentences in the active voice. In the correctly answered trials, both groups fixated longer and made more fixations on the target than on the syntactic distractor than on the lexical distractor. DHH participants made significantly longer fixations on the lexical distractions. Conclusions Our results did not support a strict preference for either lexical or semantic cues in the DHH participants.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2021.103908