6533b7d8fe1ef96bd12699f4

RESEARCH PRODUCT

Psychological intimate partner violence against women in the European Union: a cross-national invariance study

Manuel Martín-fernándezEnrique GraciaMarisol Lila

subject

Adultmedicine.medical_specialtyAdolescentCross-national researchSurveysYoung Adult03 medical and health sciencesControlling behavior0302 clinical medicineEmotional abuseSurveys and QuestionnairesCross-national researchPrevalenceHumansmedia_common.cataloged_instanceMedicine0501 psychology and cognitive sciencesMeasurement invarianceEuropean Union030212 general & internal medicineEuropean unionPsychological abuseAgedmedia_commonMeasurement invariancebusiness.industryPublic healthlcsh:Public aspects of medicine05 social sciencesInternational comparisonsPublic Health Environmental and Occupational Healthlcsh:RA1-1270Middle AgedIntimate partner violenceCross-Sectional StudiesDomestic violenceFemaleDemographic economicsBiostatisticsbusinessPsychological violenceResearch Article050104 developmental & child psychology

description

Abstract Background Intimate partner violence against women (IPVAW) is a worldwide public health problem. One of the most frequent forms of this type of violence in western societies is psychological IPVAW. According to the European Union (EU) Fundamental Rights Association (FRA) the prevalence of psychological IPVAW in the EU is 43%. However, the measurement invariance of the measure addressing psychological IPVAW in this survey has not yet been assessed. Methods The aim of this study is to ensure the cross-national comparability of this measure, by evaluating its measurement invariance across the 28 EU countries in a sample of 37,724 women, and to examine how the levels of this type of violence are distributed across the EU. Results Our results showed that the psychological IPVAW measure presented adequate psychometric properties (reliability and validity) in all countries. A latent structure of one factor was supported and scalar invariance was established in all countries. The average levels of psychological IPVAW were higher in countries like Finland, Latvia, Lithuania, and Sweden compared to the rest of the EU countries. In many of the other countries the levels of this type of violence overlapped. Conclusion Our findings underlined the importance of using appropriate statistical methods to make valid cross-national comparisons in large population surveys.

10.1186/s12889-019-7998-0https://doaj.org/article/4c0531647f9946a7800c88418379ed98