6533b7dafe1ef96bd126e302

RESEARCH PRODUCT

The bilateral field advantage effect in memory precision.

Guang ZhaoDebi RobersonChengbo XueChaoxiong YeQiang LiuYin Zhang

subject

MalePhysiologybilateral field advantageSpeech recognitionField (computer science)Functional LateralityTask (project management)0302 clinical medicineAttentionGeneral Psychologyta51505 social sciencesmemory (cognition)General MedicinenäköhavainnotNeuropsychology and Physiological PsychologyMemory Short-TermFemaleCuesPsychologyärsykkeetColor PerceptionUniversitiesExperimental and Cognitive Psychologynäkömuisti050105 experimental psychologyworking memoryvisual working memory03 medical and health sciencesPhysiology (medical)Humans0501 psychology and cognitive sciencesModerate numberStudentsmuisti (kognitio)ta113CommunicationAnalysis of Variancebusiness.industryWorking memoryAssociation Learningkapasiteettityömuistimemory precisionMental RecallVisual Fieldsbusinessvisual memory030217 neurology & neurosurgeryPhotic Stimulation

description

Previous research has demonstrated that visual working memory performance is better when visual items are allocated in both left and right visual fields than within only one hemifield. This phenomenon is called the bilateral field advantage (BFA). The BFA is thought to be driven by an enhanced probability of storage, rather than by greater precision. In the present experiments, we sought to test whether the BFA can also extend to precision when the parameters of the task are modified. Using a moderate number of to-be-remembered items and 400 ms presentation time, we found better precision in the bilateral condition than in the unilateral condition. The classic BFA was still found in the form of an enhanced probability of storage, when presentation time was 200 ms. Thus, the BFA appears to convey both enhanced precision and greater probability of storage. The BFA is most likely due to the allocation of more attentional resources, when items are presented in both left and right visual fields. peerReviewed

10.1080/17470218.2016.1276943https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28067595