6533b7dbfe1ef96bd127140e

RESEARCH PRODUCT

The effects of personality on earnings

Ellen Katrine NyhusEmpar Pons

subject

AgreeablenessEconomics and EconometricsSociology and Political ScienceEarningsmedia_common.quotation_subjectWageConscientiousnessNeuroticismPsychoticismPersonalityDemographic economicsBig Five personality traitsPsychologySocial psychologyApplied Psychologymedia_common

description

Abstract The purpose of this paper is to investigate the influence of personality dimensions on wage settings. The study was inspired by the model proposed by Bowles, Gintis, and Osborne [American Economic Review 91 (2001) 155], which shows how psychological characteristics may be rewarded or punished in the labour market due to a so-called incentive-enhancing property. Additionally, two meta-studies show that there are robust relationships between some personality dimensions and productivity [Barrick & Mount, Personnel Psychology 44 (1991) 1; Salgado, Journal of Applied Psychology 82 (1997) 30]. We used data from the DNB Household Survey (DHS) to test the extent to which certain personality dimensions are rewarded in the labour market and, therefore, contribute towards explaining the large unexplained variance in earnings. We also consider the possibility of gender-specific returns for personality in the wage setting. The DHS provides individual labour market details as well as measures of the Big Five personality factors (‘extraversion’, ‘agreeableness’, ‘conscientiousness’, ‘emotional stability’ and ‘autonomy’) from a large sample of the Dutch population. We find that emotional stability is positively associated with the wage of both women and men, while agreeableness is significantly associated with lower wages for women. Men are rewarded for autonomy as tenure increases, while conscientiousness tends to be rewarded at the beginning of an employment relationship. Finally, we find that the economic returns of the personality factors in wage determination vary between educational groups. The implications of this study are discussed.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2004.07.001