6533b7ddfe1ef96bd1273da2

RESEARCH PRODUCT

Determining exhaust fumes exposure in chainsaw operations

Francesco NeriM. C. ApreaFabio FabianoAndrea LaschiAnna CenniEnrico MarchiCristiano FoderiMartina CambiG. Sciarra

subject

PollutionMaleHealth Toxicology and Mutagenesismedia_common.quotation_subjectXyleneBTEXXylenes010501 environmental sciencesToxicology01 natural sciencesEthylbenzene03 medical and health scienceschemistry.chemical_compoundBenzene Derivative0302 clinical medicineOccupational ExposureBenzene DerivativesHumansExhaust fumesGasolinePolycyclic Aromatic HydrocarbonsBenzeneSettore AGR/06 - Tecnologia Del Legno E Utilizzazioni ForestaliVehicle Emissions0105 earth and related environmental sciencesmedia_commonAlkylate fuels Chainsaw exhaust fumeInhalation exposureInhalation ExposureBenzeneForestryGeneral MedicinePAH030210 environmental & occupational healthPollutionForest operator inhalation exposurechemistryItalyEnvironmental chemistryOccupational exposureGasolineEnvironmental MonitoringBTEXHumanToluene

description

Abstract The objective of this study was to investigate the inhalation exposure of forest operators to polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) and BTEX (benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene and total xylenes) contained in the exhaust fumes released from chainsaws and to suggest possible countermeasures. The study was carried out in four silvicultural treatments (coppice clearcut, conifer thinning, conifer pruning, and sanitary cut), using three types of chainsaw fuel (normal two-stroke petrol mix and two alkylate fuels). Eighty personal air samples were collected; IOM samplers combined with Amberlite XAD-2 sorbent tubes were used for collecting PAHs and Radiello® samplers were used for BTEX. Results indicate that none of the four silvicultural treatments significantly affected the PAHs and BTEX inhalation exposure of forest workers. On the other hand, statistically significant differences were recorded in the inhalation exposure to PAHs and BTEX when using different fuel types. In particular, the inhalation exposure to PAHs and BTEX was generally one order of magnitude lower when using modern alkylate fuels as compared to the traditional oil and lead-free petrol mixture. The small, non-statistically significant differences in inhalation exposure recorded between the two alkylate fuels suggests that the two fuels might be equivalent in terms of quality. Our study indicates that while forest workers are exposed to PAHs and BTEX, the maximum values are generally well below accepted occupational exposure limits.

10.1016/j.envpol.2016.08.070http://hdl.handle.net/10447/553690