6533b821fe1ef96bd127c3f6

RESEARCH PRODUCT

Pool choice in a vertical landscape: Tadpole‐rearing site flexibility in phytotelm‐breeding frogs

Juan D. Carvajal-castroJuan D. Carvajal-castroMarie-therese FischerPhilippe GaucherChloe A FouillouxBibiana RojasAndrius PašukonisAndrius PašukonisJanne K. ValkonenShirley Jennifer Serrano Rojas

subject

Osteocephalus oophagusArboreal locomotionvesistötEcologybiologyDendrobatessammakotNiche differentiationZoologyparental carePlant litterbiology.organism_classificationTadpolePredationpoison frogstadpolesphytotelmataAllobates femoralisniche partitioningcompetitionQH540-549.5Ecology Evolution Behavior and SystematicsvesiekologiaNature and Landscape ConservationOriginal Research

description

Abstract Many species of Neotropical frogs have evolved to deposit their tadpoles in small water bodies inside plant structures called phytotelmata. These pools are small enough to exclude large predators but have limited nutrients and high desiccation risk. Here, we explore phytotelm use by three common Neotropical species: Osteocephalus oophagus, an arboreal frog that periodically feeds eggs to its tadpoles; Dendrobates tinctorius, a tadpole‐transporting poison frog with cannibalistic tadpoles; and Allobates femoralis, a terrestrial tadpole‐transporting poison frog with omnivorous tadpoles. We found that D. tinctorius occupies pools across the chemical and vertical gradient, whereas A. femoralis and O. oophagus appear to have narrower deposition options that are restricted primarily by pool height, water capacity, alkalinity, and salinity. Dendrobates tinctorius tadpoles are particularly flexible and can survive in a wide range of chemical, physical, and biological conditions, whereas O. oophagus seems to prefer small, clear pools and A. femoralis occupies medium‐sized pools with abundant leaf litter and low salinity. Together, these results show the possible niche partitioning of phytotelmata among frogs and provide insight into stressors and resilience of phytotelm breeders.

10.1002/ece3.7741http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC8258215