6533b822fe1ef96bd127d56d
RESEARCH PRODUCT
Do different routes to becoming a special educator produce different understandings of the profession and its core concepts?
Maryann JortveitDavid Lansing Cameronsubject
media_common.quotation_subjectSpecial needsMainstreamingBachelorSpecial educationHealth Professions (miscellaneous)Teacher educationEducationCourseworkLearning disabilityPedagogyComputingMilieux_COMPUTERSANDEDUCATIONDevelopmental and Educational PsychologymedicineMathematics educationSociologymedicine.symptomInclusion (education)media_commondescription
There are multiple routes to becoming a special educator in Norway. In recent years, bachelor's degree programmes have offered an alternative to the traditional path in which special education coursework is taken as a part of teacher education. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether these different programmes produce different understandings of the special education profession and its core concepts. We surveyed 27 bachelor students and 36 teacher education students using open-ended questions concerning their future goals and expectations and the concepts of ‘inclusion,’ ‘learning disability,’ and ‘special educator’. Teacher education students were more likely to: (a) view inclusion from a broad perspective, emphasizing a sense of belonging and community, (b) define the concept of learning disability from a categorical perspective, and (c) perceive special educators as essentially ‘expert’ teachers for children with special needs. Bachelor’s degree students also emphasized special educators’ ...
year | journal | country | edition | language |
---|---|---|---|---|
2014-07-03 | European Journal of Special Needs Education |