6533b824fe1ef96bd127ffd5

RESEARCH PRODUCT

Additional file 1 of High-flow nasal cannula versus non-invasive ventilation for acute hypercapnic respiratory failure in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials

subject

description

Additional file 1: Table S1. Embase and Medline Search Results. Table S2. Cochrane Central Search Results. Table S3. Excluded Studies. Table S4. Risk of Bias Table. Fig. S1. Forest plot of mortality—subgroup analysis by risk of bias. Fig. S2. Forest plot of mortality—subgroup analysis excluding Wang et al. Fig. S3. Forest plot of intubation—subgroup analysis by risk of bias. Fig. S4. Forest plot of intubation—subgroup analysis excluding Wang et al. Fig. S5. Forest plot of ICU Length of Stay—subgroup analysis by risk of bias. Fig. S6. Forest plot of ICU Length of Stay—subgroup analysis excluding Wang et al. Fig. S7. Forest plot of Hospital Length of Stay—subgroup analysis by risk of bias. Fig. S8. Forest plot of change in comfort—subgroup analysis by AECOPD studies alone. Fig. S9. Forest plot of change in dyspnea—subgroup analysis by AECOPD studies alone. Fig. S10. Forest plot of change in respiratory rate—subgroup analysis by AECOPD studies alone. Fig. S11. Forest plot of respiratory rate—subgroup analysis by risk of bias. Fig. S12. Forest plot of change in PO2. Fig. S13. Forest plot of change in PO2—subgroup analysis by risk of bias. Fig. S14. Forest plot of change in PCO2. Fig. S15. Forest plot of change in PCO2—subgroup analysis by AECOPD studies alone. Fig. S16. Forest plot of change in PCO2—subgroup analysis by risk of bias. Fig. S17. Trial sequential analysis for mortality. Fig. S18. Trial sequential analysis for intubation. Fig. S19. Trial sequential analysis for ICU length of stay.