6533b825fe1ef96bd12826e0

RESEARCH PRODUCT

The RedTube copyright infringement affair in Germany: shame on who?

Sandra Schmitz

subject

Profit (real property)business.industrymedia_common.quotation_subjectCopyright infringementLaw enforcementShameComputingMilieux_LEGALASPECTSOFCOMPUTINGContext (language use)Legal aspects of computingComputer Science ApplicationsLawThe InternetCease and desistbusinessLawmedia_common

description

Recently, tens of thousands of German Internet users were confronted with copyright infringement claims for allegedly watching porn clips on the streaming platform RedTube.com. The alleged copyright infringers received ‘Abmahnung’ cease and desist letters that gave them an opportunity to settle copyright infringements out of court by paying rights-holders €250 in compensation. While in cases relating to peer-to-peer file-sharing, the IP address of a peer can easily be identified,1 the RedTube case raises the question how consumers of a stream could be identified. In addition, it raises the question of whether the consumption of a stream is illegal under German law. Assuming that this is not the case, this analysis of the RedTube case highlights that the system of Abmahnungen is prone to abuse in an Internet context. Several weaknesses of the current system are identified, which show that disclosure requests are not thoroughly assessed by courts and that lawyers are far too willing to send out cease and desist letters although an infringement is not obvious. This environment allowed the emergence of anti-piracy business models that succeed in turning infringements into profit and that do not hesitate to make unfounded claims.

https://doi.org/10.1080/13600869.2015.1012777