6533b827fe1ef96bd128668f

RESEARCH PRODUCT

Effects of seniority, gender and geography on the bibliometric output and collaboration networks of European Research Council (ERC) grant recipients.

Lana BaraćIvan BuljanDavid G PinaFrancisco GrimaldoAna Marušić

subject

Citation analysis ; research grants: peer reviewComputer and Information SciencesBiomedical ResearchDatabases FactualScience PolicyPeer ReviewScienceScopusResearch GrantsBibliometricsResearch and Analysis Methods050905 science studiesResearch FundingDatabase and Informatics MethodsCitation analysis0502 economics and businessCentralityHumansSeniorityDatabase SearchingLocationPublishingMedical educationMultidisciplinarybusiness.industryEuropean researchFinancing Organized05 social sciencesQRGender IdentityResearch AssessmentAuthorshipEuropeBibliometricsPublishingCitation AnalysisMedicine0509 other social sciencesbusinessCitationNetwork Analysis050203 business & managementResearch Article

description

Assessing the success and performance of researchers is a difficult task, as their grant output is influenced by a series of factors, including seniority, gender and geographical location of their host institution. In order to assess the effects of these factors, we analysed the publication and citation outputs, using Scopus and Web of Science, and the collaboration networks of European Research Council (ERC) starting (junior) and advanced (senior) grantees. For this study, we used a cohort of 355 grantees from the Life Sciences domain of years 2007-09. While senior grantees had overall greater publication output, junior grantees had a significantly greater pre-post grant award increase in their overall number of publications and in those on which they had last authorship. The collaboration networks size and the number of sub-communities increased for all grantees, although more pronounced for juniors, as they departed from smaller and more compact pre-award co- authorship networks. Both junior and senior grantees increased the size of the community within which they were collaborating in the post-award period. Pre-post grant award performance of grantees was not related to gender, although male junior grantees had more publications than female grantees before and after the grant award. Junior grantees located in lower research-performing countries published less and had less diverse collaboration networks than their peers located in higher research-performing countries. Our study suggests that research environment has greater influence on post-grant award publications than gender especially for junior grantees. Also, collaboration networks may be a useful complement to publication and citation outputs for assessing post-grant research performance, especially for grantees who already have a high publication output and who get highly competitive grants such as those from ERC.

10.1371/journal.pone.0212286https://doaj.org/article/0fca50a784064438baed2662ca354af2