6533b828fe1ef96bd12878c2

RESEARCH PRODUCT

Gendered Use of the Hedge in Academic Discourse

Jolanta Szymańska

subject

Writing styleMetadiscourseSociologyHedge (finance)Construct (philosophy)Relation (history of concept)DisciplineCommunicative behaviorLinguistics

description

This paper discusses the distribution of hedges in academic texts in relation to the gender of the writer. The assumption prior to the analysis concerned possible differences in communicative practices between male and female writers reflected in the hedging of their propositions. The textual material covers 20 research articles, 10 written by male and 10 by female authors, published in the Journal of Linguistics in the years 2001–2010. Metadiscourse as “discourse about discourse” is connected with the communicative, social and personal involvement (Hyland 2000). Hedges, as indicators of the writer’s stance, should reveal characteristics of particular writing styles based on powerful or supportive interaction depending on gender (Coates 2004). The aim of this sample analysis is to discover whether gender is traceable in the ways male and female writers construct their stance through hedging in academic disciplinary writing.

yearjournalcountryeditionlanguage
2013-01-01
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-35305-5_1