6533b829fe1ef96bd128a60e

RESEARCH PRODUCT

Judging the contact-times of multiple objects: Evidence for asymmetric interference.

Daniel OberfeldHeiko HechtRobin Baurès

subject

Psychological refractory periodAdultMalemedia_common.quotation_subjectInterference theoryMotion PerceptionExperimental and Cognitive PsychologyBottleneckJudgmentArts and Humanities (miscellaneous)Capacity sharingPerceptionDevelopmental and Educational PsychologyHumansmedia_commonAnalysis of Variancebusiness.industryMemoriaDistance PerceptionCognitionPattern recognitionGeneral MedicineTime perceptionRefractory Period PsychologicalTime PerceptionFemaleArtificial intelligencePsychologybusinessSocial psychologyPhotic Stimulation

description

The accuracy of time-to-contact (TTC) judgments for single approaching objects is well researched, however, close to nothing is known about our ability to make simultaneous TTC judgments for two or more objects. Such complex judgments are required in many everyday situations, for instance when crossing a multi-lane street or when engaged in multi-player ball games. We used a prediction-motion paradigm in which participants simultaneously estimated the absolute TTC of two objects, and compared the performance to a standard single-object condition. Results showed that the order of arrival of the two objects determined the accuracy of the TTC estimates: Estimation of the first-arriving object was unaffected by the added complexity compared to the one-object condition, whereas the TTC of the second-arriving object was systematically overestimated. This result has broad implications for complex everyday situations. We suggest that it is akin to effects observed in experiments on the psychological refractory period (PRP) and that the proactive interference of the first-arriving object indicates a bottleneck or capacity sharing at the central stage.

10.1016/j.actpsy.2010.03.009https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20423735