6533b82bfe1ef96bd128d865

RESEARCH PRODUCT

FRN and P3 during the Iowa gambling task: The importance of gender.

Matias M. PulopulosMatias M. PulopulosMario Perez-alarcónRuth Garrido-chavesAlicia SalvadorVanesa PerezVanesa Hidalgo

subject

Neural correlates of consciousnessEndocrine and Autonomic SystemsCognitive NeuroscienceGeneral Neuroscience05 social sciencesExperimental and Cognitive PsychologyNegativity effectAffect (psychology)Iowa gambling task050105 experimental psychologyTask (project management)03 medical and health sciences0302 clinical medicineNeuropsychology and Physiological PsychologyDevelopmental NeuroscienceNeurologyFeedback related negativity0501 psychology and cognitive sciencesYoung adultPsychology030217 neurology & neurosurgeryBiological PsychiatryClinical psychology

description

Previous research has shown gender-related psychobiological differences in risky and competitive strategies that affect win and loss outcomes. In addition, some studies have found differences in the decision-making process, with women taking longer to reach the same performance as men. However, the underlying neural mechanisms remain unclear. The present study aimed to investigate gender differences in behavioral performance and neural correlates during a decision-making task, the Iowa Gambling Task (IGT). Forty healthy young adults (23 men and 17 women) performed the IGT while the feedback-related negativity (FRN) and P3 were recorded as neural correlates of feedback processing. No gender differences were observed in the behavioral performance on the IGT after 100 and 150 trials, or in the P3 component. In women, but not in men, the FRN component showed a greater amplitude for losses than for wins. There were no significant gender-related differences in behavioral performance, and men and women revealed a similar learning process on the IGT. At the neural level, no direct differences between men and women were observed in the feedback processing stage for the FRN or P3. However, our results indicate that women showed greater sensitivity to losses than to wins during the decision-making task, as reflected in the FRN component.

10.1111/psyp.13734https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33289135