6533b82bfe1ef96bd128d871

RESEARCH PRODUCT

Fracture resistance and the mode of failure produced in metal-free crowns cemented onto zirconia abutments in dental implants.

Ana Roig-vanaclochaBlanca Serra-pastorAntonio Fons-fontMaría Fernanda Solá-ruízRubén Agustín-panadero

subject

CeramicsTeethMedical Implantsmedicine.medical_treatmentDentistry02 engineering and technologyMaterial Fatigue0302 clinical medicineMaterials PhysicsMaterials TestingMedicine and Health SciencesCubic zirconiaDental Restoration FailureMaterialsDental CementumTitaniumProstheticsMultidisciplinaryCrownsPhysicsQRClassical Mechanics021001 nanoscience & nanotechnologyChemistryPhysical SciencesMedicineEngineering and TechnologyAnatomy0210 nano-technologyTitaniumResearch ArticleBiotechnologyChemical ElementsMaterials scienceScienceBiomaterial ImplantsMaterials ScienceAbutmentchemistry.chemical_elementBioengineeringLithiumCrown (dentistry)Anterior region03 medical and health sciencesmedicineHumansTitanium ImplantsDental ImplantsDamage Mechanicsbusiness.industryBiology and Life Sciences030206 dentistryDental PorcelainAssistive TechnologieschemistryMetal freeJawFracture (geology)Zirconium oxideMedical Devices and EquipmentZirconiumbusinessDigestive SystemHead

description

The purpose of the investigation was to analyze fracture resistance and mode of failure of zirconium oxide (zirconia) abutments placed on dental implants bearing crowns of different esthetic materials: zirconia, lithium disilicate (LDS), and nano-ceramic resin, for replacing single teeth in the anterior sector. Eighty implant-abutment-crown units were divided into four groups: Group T-MC (control): 20 metal-ceramic crowns cemented onto titanium abutments; Group Z-Z: 20 zirconia crowns on zirconia abutments; Group Z-LD: 20 lithium disilicate crowns on zirconia abutments; and Group Z-NCR: 20 nano-ceramic resin crowns on zirconia abutments. Specimens underwent a fatiguing process (dynamic loading and thermocycling), followed by static loading to evaluate mechanical fracture resistance, and the mode of failure produced. Mean fracture resistance values were: Control Group T-MC, 575.85±120.01 N; Group Z-Z 459.64±66.52 N; Group Z-LD, 531.77±34.10 N; and Group Z-NCR, 587.05±59.27 N. In Group T-MC, fracture occurred in the prosthetic fixing screw in 100% of specimens. In Group Z-Z, 80% of fractures occurred in the fixing screw, 15% in the abutment, and 5% in the abutment and crown. In Group Z-LD, 60% of fractures were produced in the fixing screw and 40% in the abutment. In Group Z-NCR, 70% of fractures were produced in the fixing screw and 30% in the abutment. All the abutments and crowns analyzed have the potential to withstand the physiological occlusal forces to which they would be subject in the anterior region. Lithium disilicate and nano-ceramic resin crowns cemented onto zirconia abutments are a good restoration alternative for single implants in the anterior sector.

10.1371/journal.pone.0220551https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31393888