6533b82cfe1ef96bd128ff61
RESEARCH PRODUCT
Collective agency and the concept of ‘public’ in public involvement: A practice-oriented analysis
Daniel StrechTobias HainzSabine Bossertsubject
Biomedical ResearchHealth (social science)Debate0603 philosophy ethics and religionRepresentativeness heuristicHealth(social science)03 medical and health sciencesGood governance0302 clinical medicineHumansCollective agency030212 general & internal medicineSociologybusiness.industryHealth PolicyCommunity ParticipationRepresentation (systemics)06 humanities and the artsPublic relationsPublic involvementRepresentationCollective agencyPublic involvementIssues ethics and legal aspectsPhilosophy of medicine060302 philosophyProperty aElement (criminal law)businessdescription
Background Public involvement activities are promoted as measures for ensuring good governance in challenging fields, such as biomedical research and innovation. Proponents of public involvement activities include individual researchers as well as non-governmental and governmental organizations. However, the concept of ‘public’ in public involvement deserves more attention by researchers because it is not purely theoretical: it has important practical functions in the guidance, evaluation and translation of public involvement activities. Discussion This article focuses on collective agency as one property a public as a small group of participants in a public involvement activity could exhibit. It introduces a prominent theoretical approach to collective agents as one specific kind of social entities and demonstrates how this approach can be applied to current practice in public involvement activities. A brief discussion of different types of representation as they are used in the existing literature on this topic is also included because representation and collective agency can be closely related to each other. Suggestions and ideas that are derived from this reasoning include the proposal to use a ‘validity check’ for the generation of collective agents as a regular element of certain types of public involvement activities, the consequences of combining collective agency and representativeness as a further property a public could exhibit, and standards for reporting the content of public involvement activities in scientific publications. Summary This article discusses the importance of the concept of ‘public’ in public involvement activities, with a focus on biomedical research and innovation. It introduces various practically relevant ideas that are based on a theoretical analysis of collective agency as an important property a public can possess. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12910-015-0083-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
year | journal | country | edition | language |
---|---|---|---|---|
2016-01-05 | BMC Medical Ethics |