6533b82dfe1ef96bd1290a5f
RESEARCH PRODUCT
Resolving the Puzzle of Conspiracy Worldview and Political Activism: Belief in Secret Plots Decreases Normative but Increases Nonnormative Political Engagement
Lea DieterlePia LambertyRoland Imhoffsubject
Social PsychologyPsyArXiv|Social and Behavioral Sciences|Social and Personality Psychology|Politics05 social sciencesPolitical action050109 social psychologyPolitical engagement050105 experimental psychologyEpistemologyPsyArXiv|Social and Behavioral SciencesClinical Psychologybepress|Social and Behavioral SciencesPolitical activismbepress|Social and Behavioral Sciences|Psychology|Social PsychologyNormativebepress|Social and Behavioral Sciences|Psychology|Personality and Social Contexts0501 psychology and cognitive sciencesPsyArXiv|Social and Behavioral Sciences|Social and Personality PsychologyPsychologydescription
It is a hitherto open and debated question whether the belief in conspiracies increases or attenuates the willingness to engage in political action. In the present article, we tested the notion, whether (a) the relation between belief in conspiracies and general political engagement is curvilinear (inverted U-shaped) and (b) there may be opposing relations to normative versus nonnormative forms of political engagement. Two preregistered experiments ( N = 194, N = 402) support both propositions and show that the hypothetical adoption of a worldview that sees the world as governed by secret plots attenuates reported intentions to participate in normative, legal forms of political participation but increases reported intentions to employ nonnormative, illegal means of political articulation. These results provide first evidence for the notion that political extremism and violence might seem an almost logical conclusion when seeing the world as governed by conspiracies.
| year | journal | country | edition | language |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-28 | Social Psychological and Personality Science |