6533b82efe1ef96bd1294530

RESEARCH PRODUCT

Prioritizing covariates in the planning of future studies in the meta-analytic framework

Mikko J. SillanpääJuha Karvanen

subject

0301 basic medicineStatistics and ProbabilityFalse discovery rateComputer scienceBayesian probabilityBayes factorGeneral MedicineMultiple-criteria decision analysis01 natural sciencesConfidence interval010104 statistics & probability03 medical and health sciences030104 developmental biologySample size determinationCovariateEconometrics0101 mathematicsStatistics Probability and UncertaintyDivergence (statistics)

description

Science can be seen as a sequential process where each new study augments evidence to the existing knowledge. To have the best prospects to make an impact in this process, a new study should be designed optimally taking into account the previous studies and other prior information. We propose a formal approach for the covariate prioritization, i.e., the decision about the covariates to be measured in a new study. The decision criteria can be based on conditional power, change of the p-value, change in lower confidence limit, Kullback-Leibler divergence, Bayes factors, Bayesian false discovery rate or difference between prior and posterior expectation. The criteria can be also used for decisions on the sample size. As an illustration, we consider covariate prioritization based on genome-wide association studies for C-reactive protein levels and make suggestions on the genes to be studied further. keywords: design; evidence-based medicine; meta-analysis; power; scientific method

https://doi.org/10.1002/bimj.201600067