6533b831fe1ef96bd1298ef7
RESEARCH PRODUCT
Conditions and strategies to meet the challenges imposed by the COVID-19-related visiting restrictions in the intensive care unit: A Scandinavian cross-sectional study
Eva ÅKermanHanne Irene JensenHanne Birgit AlfheimGro FrivoldIsabell FridhAnne Sophie ÅGårdRanveig Lindsubject
Cross-sectional studyPårørendeCritical Care NursingNEEDSlaw.inventionlawWORLDMedicineANXIETYKoronaSurveyChildGROUNDED THEORYmedia_commonNorwaypårørendeVDP::Medisinske fag: 700::Helsefag: 800::Sykepleievitenskap: 808Intensive care unitHospitalsEXPERIENCESPeer reviewIntensive Care UnitsSykehusMEMBERSKorona / CoronaVisitationResearch ArticleAdultmedicine.medical_specialtySykehus / HospitalsCompromisemedia_common.quotation_subjectStaffingCOVID-19 pandemicLikert scaleUnit (housing)VDP::Medical disciplines: 700::Health sciences: 800::Nursing science: 808Next of kinVDP::Nursing science: 808Intensive careHumansFamilyVDP::Sykepleievitenskap: 808Pårørende / Next of kinFAMILY-CENTERED CAREbusiness.industrySARS-CoV-2COVID-19Covid-19 / Covid-19VDP::Midical sciences: 700::Health sciences: 800::Nursing science: 808RelativesscandinaviaCross-Sectional StudiesFamily medicineBesøgsrestriktionerICUCoronabusinessintensivafdelingdescription
ObjectivesTo examine conditions and strategies to meet the challenges imposed by the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)-related visiting restrictions in Scandinavian intensive care units.Research methodology/designA cross-sectional survey.SettingAdult intensive care units in Denmark, Norway and Sweden.Main outcome measuresLikert scale responses and free-text comments within six areas: capacity and staffing, visiting policies and access to the unit, information and conferences with relatives, written information, children as relatives and follow-up initiatives.ResultsThe overall response rate was 53% (74/140 participating units). All intensive care units had planned for capacity extensions; the majority ranging between 11 and 30 extra beds. From March–June 2020, units had a mean maximum of 9.4 COVID-19 patients simultaneously. Allowing restricted visiting was more common in Denmark (52%) and Norway (61%) than in Sweden where visiting was mostly denied except for dying patients (68%), due to a particular increased number of COVID-19 patients. The restrictions forced nurses to compromise on their usual standards of family care. Numerous models for maintaining contact between relatives and patients were described.ConclusionVisitation restrictions compromised the quality of family care and entailed dilemmas for healthcare professionals but also spurred initiatives to developing new ways of providing family care.
year | journal | country | edition | language |
---|---|---|---|---|
2022-02-01 |