6533b833fe1ef96bd129b869
RESEARCH PRODUCT
(De-)Accentuation and the Processing of Information Status: Evidence from Event-Related Brain Potentials
Petra B. SchumacherStefan Baumannsubject
AdultMaleLinguistics and LanguageSound SpectrographySpeech perceptionSociology and Political ScienceConcept FormationContingent Negative VariationContext (language use)Speech AcousticsLanguage and LinguisticsYoung AdultSpeech and HearingNeurolinguisticsEvent-related potentialStress (linguistics)HumansNeurolinguistic ProgrammingDominance CerebralEvoked PotentialsCerebral CortexBrain MappingPitch accentElectroencephalographySignal Processing Computer-AssistedGeneral MedicineLinguisticsN400SemanticsFocus (linguistics)Speech PerceptionFemaleCuesPsychologypsychological phenomena and processesdescription
The paper reports on a perception experiment in German that investigated the neuro-cognitive processing of information structural concepts and their prosodic marking using event-related brain potentials (ERPs). Experimental conditions controlled the information status (given vs. new) of referring and non-referring target expressions (nouns vs. adjectives) and were elicited via context sentences, which did not – unlike most previous ERP studies in the field – trigger an explicit focus expectation. Target utterances displayed prosodic realizations of the critical words which differed in accent position and accent type. Electrophysiological results showed an effect of information status, maximally distributed over posterior sites, displaying a biphasic N400 - Late Positivity pattern for new information. We claim that this pattern reflects increased processing demands associated with new information, with the N400 indicating enhanced costs from linking information with the previous discourse and the Late Positivity indicating the listener’s effort to update his/her discourse model. The prosodic manipulation registered more pronounced effects over anterior regions and revealed an enhanced negativity followed by a Late Positivity for deaccentuation, probably also reflecting costs from discourse linking and updating respectively. The data further lend indirect support for the idea that givenness applies not only to referents but also to non-referential expressions (‘lexical givenness’).
year | journal | country | edition | language |
---|---|---|---|---|
2012-10-26 | Language and Speech |