6533b833fe1ef96bd129c247
RESEARCH PRODUCT
Comparison of different statistical approaches to evaluate morphometric sperm subpopulations in men.
Pilar SantolariaAraceli BonoS. Vicente-fielJosé M BernéCarles SolerJesús YánizTeresa CarreteroPilar Recreosubject
MaleMultivariate statisticsendocrine systemUrologyInvited Original ArticleBiologylcsh:RC870-923Semen collectionCell sizeAndrology03 medical and health sciences0302 clinical medicinemanCluster AnalysisHumansCell Shapereproductive and urinary physiologyCell SizePrincipal Component Analysis030219 obstetrics & reproductive medicineurogenital system0402 animal and dairy science04 agricultural and veterinary sciencesGeneral Medicinelcsh:Diseases of the genitourinary system. Urology040201 dairy & animal scienceSpermSpermatozoaNuclear shapeSemen AnalysisPrincipal component analysissperm subpopulationscomputer-assisted sperm morphometry analysis; man; sperm subpopulationscomputer-assisted sperm morphometry analysisdescription
This study was designed to characterize morphometric sperm subpopulations in normozoospermic men by using different statistical methods and examining their suitability to classify correctly different sperm nuclear morphologies present in human ejaculates. Ejaculates from 21 normozoospermic men were collected for the study. After semen collection and analysis, samples were prepared for morphometric determination. At least 200 spermatozoa per sample were assessed for sperm morphometry by computer-assisted sperm morphometry analysis (CASA-Morph) using fluorescence. Clustering and discriminant procedures were performed to identify sperm subpopulations from the morphometric data obtained. Clustering procedures resulted in the classification of spermatozoa into three morphometric subpopulations (large-round 30.4%, small-round 46.6%, and large-elongated 22.9%). In the second analysis, using discriminant methods, the classification was made independently of size and shape. Three morphological categories according to nuclear size (small 13.07 μm2) and four categories were defined on 400 canonical cells (100 × 4) from 10 men according to sperm nuclear shape (oval, pyriform, round, and elongated). Thereafter, the resulting classification functions were used to categorize 4200 spermatozoa from 21 men. Differences in the class distribution were observed among men from both clustering and discriminant procedures. It was concluded that the combination of CASA-Morph fluorescence-based technology with multivariate cluster or discriminant analyses provides new information on the description of different morphometric sperm subpopulations in normal individuals, and that important variations in the distribution of morphometric sperm subpopulations may exist between men, with possible functional implications.
year | journal | country | edition | language |
---|---|---|---|---|
2016-09-15 | Asian journal of andrology |