6533b835fe1ef96bd129eaad

RESEARCH PRODUCT

Barriers to physical activity in coronary artery disease patients: Development and validation of a new scale

Martin JuneauMartin JuneauVincent GremeauxVincent GremeauxCharles JoussainDavy LarocheDavy LarocheB. D’antonoB. D’antonoJ. Joubert

subject

AdultMalemedicine.medical_specialtyPsychometricsNeuropsychological Tests030204 cardiovascular system & hematologyCoronary artery diseaseStatistics NonparametricValidityYoung Adult03 medical and health sciences0302 clinical medicine[SDV.MHEP.CSC]Life Sciences [q-bio]/Human health and pathology/Cardiology and cardiovascular systemCronbach's alphamedicineContent validityHumansOrthopedics and Sports MedicineProspective cohort studyExerciseReliability (statistics)Face validityPrincipal Component AnalysisPhysical activityQuestionnairebusiness.industryRehabilitationReproducibility of ResultsConstruct validity[ SDV.MHEP.CSC ] Life Sciences [q-bio]/Human health and pathology/Cardiology and cardiovascular systemReliabilityScale (social sciences)Physical therapyAnxietyFemaleSelf Reportmedicine.symptombusinessBarriers030217 neurology & neurosurgery

description

Abstract Objective To develop and validate a self-report questionnaire to measure barriers to regular physical activity (PA) in patients with stable coronary artery disease (CAD). Methods Phase 1: 17 patients completed a semi-structured interview. After grouping and reformulating the reported barriers, their pertinence was reevaluated by the patients. Then, a decision algorithm was used to select items. A principal component analysis was performed to determine content validity. Phase 2: 49 patients completed the questionnaire resulting from phase 1 twice, 7 days apart, and questionnaires to evaluate depression, anxiety, and the level of physical activity. Construct validity was evaluated by analysis of Spearman's correlation coefficient between the total score for the questionnaire and a convergent dimension (anxiety), as well as a divergent dimension (Dijon physical activity score). Internal consistency was evaluated by Cronbach's alpha coefficient. Test-retest reliability was evaluated by the intraclass coefficient (ICC). Results Eleven items were selected after phase 1. The questionnaire presented good face validity and the content validity seemed satisfactory after analysis of the literature by the experts. Construct validity was moderate. Internal consistency was very good (Cronbach's α>0.81). Reproducibility was excellent with an ICC at 0.95. Feasibility was good with less than 3 minutes to complete the questionnaire. Conclusion This questionnaire presents good psychometric properties. A further prospective study should evaluate sensitivity to change and help determine a threshold value indicating the need for a specific behavioral strategy to alleviate barriers to physical activity in these patients.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rehab.2017.01.002